UAE terrorist photo

Arab Firm to Delay U.S. Port Takeover

WASHINGTON (AP) — A United Arab Emirates company has volunteered to postpone its takeover of significant operations at six major U.S. seaports, giving the White House more time to convince skeptical lawmakers the deal poses no increased risks from terrorism.
Many people in America have great concerns about this take over by the UAE. Possible former ties to terrorists. Political choices the UAE has made.


The Bush Administration reminded people that the UAE would not be in charge of security at these ports.

Security of the ports would be done by this person…

Missy


Missy has some big bombs!


If Missy sees any monkey business going on, she has the authority to "blow the crap out of them peoples."

Why Saddam?




Why Saddam?


If you wanted to prove Saddam could be controlled by UN inspectors, you can probably find information to argue this point.
If you want to prove Saddam was a threat and needed to be removed, you can easily do that as well.
With so much evidence for either side, the invasion of Iraq will be debated for years. I believe the removal of Saddam was necessary. This is what I will try and prove here!


"..Reagan helped Saddam [sic] then we turn around and invade Iraq.."


This statement ticks me off! Japan attacked us, now we are best buddies. So what? People change, countries change.
What really gets me is this statement is not really true. Reagan removed a weapons embargo against Iraq. But Reagan didn’t trust BOTH Iraq and Iran. Iraq had dealings with the Soviets and Reagan never trusted the Russians. When the war broke out between Iran and Iraq, the Soviets temporarily cut off weapons to Iraq. Reagan removed the US weapons embargo which allowed US weapon manufacturer to sell to Israel. Who would then sell to Iraq. Henry Kissinger made the statement that summed up the feelings of the time: "The best outcome would be for both sides to lose." It was less about helping Saddam and more about making sure Iran didn’t win. Iran, after all, did hold Americans hostage.


"..Saddam thought he had America’s blessing to invade Kuwait..."


There is a theory, (and Saddam claims it) that the American ambassador to Iraq made Saddam think it was OK to attack Kuwait. We may never know if this is true but it doesn’t matter. It took months to build a coalition the fight Saddam. It took a long time to get the equipment over to the Middle East. Saddam had lots of time to say: "Opps, I made a mistake. I’ll just go now." Saddam never did and a world coalition removed Saddam from Kuwait.


"...We should have removed Saddam the first time, Bush is fixing his daddy’s F**k up.."


Yes, we should have removed Saddam the first time. But we were following the UN Resolution. This was to remove Saddam out of Kuwait and cripple Saddam’s military so he couldn’t invade anyone else. (We do not follow the UN as closely now.) I would say it was the UN’s- F**K up.
Saddam had an opportunity to change his ways, he never did.


"..We never gave inspectors enough time to do their job.."


11 years is quite enough time. Inspectors cannot do their job when Saddam kicked them out. President Bush (41) had problems with Saddam. President Clinton had to use missile strikes into Iraq. This didn’t work. After 9/11, we had to take a good look at the world around us.


"..Bush rushed us into this illegal war.."


This war is not illegal! President Bush got congressional votes for authority to remove Saddam. The UN has not formally charged the United States with any major crimes. Bush gave Saddam 11 months to let Hanns Blix inspect Iraq. Saddam blocked Hanns from inspecting 100% of Iraq. American Soldiers removed Saddam and placed him in jail. There is nothing illegal here.


"..Iran and North Korea are more dangerous then Iraq..."


Today that is true! With Saddam in jail, his military crushed, and any weapons he had either destroyed or moved into another country, Saddam is no threat now. Bush was not pulling names out of his ass when he said, just after 9/11, that Iraq, Iran and North Korea were the problem countries in the world today. Central Command and The Pentagon had been watching these three countries long before Bush became president. Some people were stunned that Bush referred to North Korea, and Iran had been quiet for years. People are not saying that anymore.


"..Bush lied about WMD’s to go to war with Saddam.."


There is no proof President Bush lied. Most people believed Saddam was up to something. No one can say he was a good man. Bush truly believed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. If this administration was as corrupt as the left claims, they could have just planted weapons in the desert and been done with it.


Why Saddam?


He gassed his own people to death. He lied to the world. He would regularly have his military shoot at our pilots in the no fly zones. He caused three American Presidents, over a fifteen year period, to fight him in some manner. He was acting guilty, never allowing weapons inspectors to check all of Iraq. He thumbed his nose at Hanns Blix, the UN, and America. He cannot do that anymore, he is in prison.
Blame Saddam. Had he let Hanns Blix do his job. If Saddam would have given the UN any weapons he had. Saddam would still be in charge of Iraq right now. His sons would be in line for office. The rape rooms would be full. Punishment for crimes would be back to an Iraqi normal, you disappear forever. Saddam was foolish and now he sits in jail.
If you are a cop and you have three criminals before you. You cannot physically arrest all three at the same time. (and there is no back-up to come help you.) You would pick the one who has committed the most serious crimes and fight him. You take that criminal to jail. Then you deal with the others.
The leaders of Iran and North Korea watched the video of Saddam being dragged out of a hole in the ground. They do not want that to happen to themselves. If a future evil dictator sees American troops, ships and planes stacking up near its borders. When the American President, (who ever he or she might be) gives this dictator a warning, this evil dictator will remember Saddam being dragged out of the ground and thrown in jail. This will shape what that person does next.
Empty threats mean nothing. There is nothing empty about an American threat! We warned Saddam. We told him what we would do. He didn't listen. So we did what we said we would do. Our brave soldiers removed Saddam.
Saddam has only himself to blame. The rest of the world knows this to be true!

Written by Biff Babonie


Research material used


War and Peace in the Middle East.. By Avi Shlaim
American Soldier.. By General Tommy Franks
America's Secret War.. By George Friedman

"Following editorial's from this series are"


Post 1- Who Created Al-Qaeda? (Quick Link)


Post 2-Radical Islam: The beginning. (Quick Link)

Post 3- Why Saddam?


Post 4- The Forth World War



Thanks for reading The Angry Republican!



Al Gore

This just pisses me off to no limits. You may have heard that Al Gore did a speech in Saudi Arabia in which he was paid for it. He did a little America bashing. Here is some of what he said:


"Arabs in the United States have been indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order, and held in conditions that were just unforgivable."
Bill O'Reilly's show called Al Gore's office to find out which Arab's, Gore was talking about and what places the former VP thought were "unforgivable." Gore's office would not give examples. "It figures!"
Well, this sucks! I wanted to know!
After 9/11, we did round up many people, (Almost all Arab) whose paperwork and Visa's were illegal. The figure I have is that only 13 people were wrongly picked up. Out of hundreds of people who had faulty green cards, only 13 were mistakes!
Remember that we were just attacked by terrorists who were living in this country. Some of them had expired Visa's. We had to check all Arab's with expired Visa's.
We didn't have offshore military prisons, set up for this, at that point. These folks were put into general population in a normal prison.
So what the hell is Al Gore talking about?
I could almost understand if Gore was criticizing America here in this country. But to do this in other countries, it doesn't make sense? Democrats are not gaining votes by saying this stuff overseas. Just bashing this country and getting paid for it.
You never saw Nixon, Reagan, Ford or Bush condemn Clinton or Carter while they were the President. It wasn't because they couldn't. Both Carter and Clinton gave republicans lots of dirty laundry to air to the world. The former republican presidents didn't take part in attacking democratic president because of dignity.
It is called respect for the presidency! (Not necessarily respect for the man!)
I had done a post on this topic (on November 4, 2005 7:46 PM)
You can click here for that post! Titled "Out Of Power And Out Of Control"
Just add Al Gores name to it if you read it!

Oops! - Bush Unaware Mikes Were Still On

CAMBRIDGE, Md. (AP) — The eavesdropping tables were turned on President Bush on Friday. The president apparently believed he was speaking privately when he talked about listening in without a warrant on domestic communications with suspected al-Qaida terrorists overseas. But reporters were the ones doing the listening in this time.

"I support the free press, let's just get them out of the room,"

Once the reporters were far enough away, Bush and his republican cronies talked about stuff they picked up in the wiretaps. Old lady Crepps has a wooden leg. Joe Smith, from Florida, doesn't really have a girl friend, and Judy Jones from Texas, we know they are not real.

Something did come out of all this. Right after this important Republican "meeting of the minds", police swarmed in and arrested this pig.

That pig was a filthy, stinking, terrorist! He was on his way to blow up a strategic pig farm. He was using his American phone to call Osama personally. Getting funds and information. Bush got that stinking pig!

Did we kill ourselves!

It is interesting what you will find on the Internet. A fellow e-mailed me to get me to check out his site. I go over there and he has a left-wing propaganda site called "scholars for 9/11 truth.org."
So I comment and get called a "redneck."
I like that!
Here is the idea being pushed:
"Americans blew up our own buildings during 9/11 so we could go to war."
Here is one photo showing how a jet could never fit into the hole of the pentagon.


So.. it must have been a cruise missile that made this hole in the pentagon. And liberals wonder why we think they are stupid! meanderthalis, I have an experiment for you. Take a pop can and put it under your car tire. Drive over it! What happens? The soft rubber tire smashes the metal can.
When a light-weight, aluminum jet slams into a steel beamed, cement walled building. (That was constructed to be a bomb shelter.) "There isn't going to be much left of that jet."
But this propaganda site goes on. That the jets crashing into the World Trade Towers couldn't have brought them down. Something else must have done that!
Here is the quote:
David Ray Griffin states:No Prior Collapse Induced by Fire. The official theory is rendered implausible by two major problems. The first is the simple fact that fire has never---prior to or after 9/11---caused steel-frame high-rise buildings to collapse.This is completely false! Just after 9/11, a scientific study done on a British building that was due for demolition, showed that the "multi-interlocking deck design" of the World Trade Towers would not stand the "heat" from an intense fire. (A fire from jet fuel.) Because the deck design was riveted, instead of riveted and welded, it collapsed from heat. The steel didn't melt, it warped causing the rivets to 'pop.' (This was proved in the study.) The weight of multiple decks, (Floors) falling down on the floors below, caused the entire collapse.

The builders of the WT Towers, Minoru Yamasaki, never planned for a fully fueled jet to slam into it. It was not thought of in the 1970's. However, they believe that a jet, with little fuel, lost in fog while trying to land at JFK, would never have brought down the WT Towers. A jet taking off from JFK, full of fuel, never gets near the towers. The builders never thought anyone would fly jets, full of fuel, purposely into the Towers.
Manning has an excellent take on this! For the US government to have done this to the America people, here's what would have happened…(you got to read this!)
Click here for Manning's post
Also
For anyone following this, I have a great site from an engineer's perspective.
Click here for Nova!

But, the fact remains. Osama masterminded this event. Terrorists carried it out.
So now, meanderthalis gets a little 'pissy.' Here are some of his replies. (Edited down, of course.)
"Seems to me this scares you a bit. Goes against everything you believed about your terrorist nation."
"As for angryrepublican, you are whining like a little child. Its a bit difficult to stomach, but there it is, in black and white."
"I'd like to see your reference. If it exists. If you can't be bothered to back up what you say, shut up."
That's funny, the guy asks me to read his sight, then tells me to 'shut-up' when I comment.
" And you are an expert on aeroplanes, and jet fuel, right. So we should trust you. How simple. Trust the redneck. He knows the answers."
"Come on, be fair. Have I called you a redneck?? I mailed you the link so that you could respond to something that you (????) feel strongly about."
( i regret calling him a redneck, he seems to have taken it too seriously)
Actually no! I haven't taken it too seriously. I am having great fun with this stuff!
meanderthalis, The one site you offer to people is a 'tongue in cheek' left wing site. Most people understand that much of what is shown on that site is.. Well.. Not true. That is what Serendipity does.
The other site, "scholars for 9/11 truth.org." Has been out for a while.
They are a group of liberals who are trying to discredit the president.
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D, says: "As long as these photographs are authentic and those measurements are correct—which concerns the quality of the evidence for not q and appears to be rather difficult to dispute—then no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon.49 Q.E.D. " This guy never visited the crash site! He is using photos and hoping the measurements are correct.
Folks, I just thought this was wild stuff and wanted to share it with others.
Americans blew up our own buildings on 9/11.
Hey, every once in a while I like to read some fiction!
meanderthalis, you may think I am picking on you. I am not. The simple fact that I am doing a post on this subject means, (In a twisted, condescending sort of way) that I am interested in this topic.
I just can not stand anti-Americanism. If you would have calmly discussed this theory to me, the aftermath would have remained in a gentlemen fashion. But you call Americans fools, a terrorist nation, rednecks, etc.
"Man, dems is fighten' words."
Of course I am going to attack you! I have placed in your comment section a bunch of references on The World Trade Towers. If you would like to discuss this some more, hell, I'll play along. But when the Super Bowl starts, you will have to play with yourself.
meanderthalis post is titled: "Have you seen this?"
Serendipity's web page here
"scholars for 9/11 truth.org." here
If you want news and facts taunted with lies, check out "Bad News!"

For the site, where this came from, with tons of comments, click here- angryrepublican