What???

Teen changes his name to: KentuckyFriedCruelty

NEW YORK (AP) — A 19-year-old PETA staffer has legally changed his name to KentuckyFriedCruelty.
Chris Garnett, youth outreach coordinator for the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, said he changed his name in support of the group's anti-KFC campaign.

"Stacked" star Pamela Anderson, who has narrated a PETA video showing the alleged abuse, supports Garnett's name change.
"I'm sure Chris can't wait till KFC stops torturing chickens so he can change his name back," the actress said in a statement, adding that the chicken abuse "is awful and has to stop."

We have found some pictures of the terrible abuses KFC has done to these poor birds..

If you have small children, you may want to move them to another room while you view these photo's…

Here we see that KFC is forcing this bird to stand next to the president of Iran.

In this next photo, which is shocking, a KFC worker is spraying this poor bird with a mixture of butter and milk.
Even more shocking… KFC kills chickens and serves them as food for humans!

"I'm with you Pam!!

Now let's go get a cheeseburger."

FDR

One of the things I am hearing liberals say is the old Michael Moore line:
"The Bush administration is trying to scare us, so they can grab more power. That is why they are talking about a war on terror. There is no war."

Some say we can never win a war on terror. That is sad.

We all agree blowing up innocent people is wrong. This is what terrorists do. They kill innocent people. They do not come at our military, head on. They hide. Plant bombs, deliberately to try to kill women and children. They have targeted children who were getting candy.

People are asking you to turn your backs on this. They say that those Arab people over there are not worth fighting for. "It is not our problem."
September 11 made it our problem. This was the terrorists second attempt at knocking those mammoth buildings down. They were successful.

Terrorists are loosing. They have commented their "Hitler Moment." By attacking fellow Arabs in Jordan and Iraq, terrorists have opened up more war fronts then they can handle. Just like Hitler, they became drunk with power, they do not have enough manpower to handle the amount they have chosen to take on. "They really thought you Americans would cut and run!!"

For the first time, terrorists cannot move freely through the Middle East. Police forces are rounding up terrorists in countries like Pakistan. More round-up will follow.

I got a chance today, to hear one of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's "fireside" speeches that he made. This one was done during the third year of WWII. "It makes you proud to be an American!" Many people said we couldn't beat Hitler. Charles Lindbergh was one who said we should pack up and come home, Hitler was too powerful. President Roosevelt's speech made it seem important to try and defeat these Germans. Many people in America believed we had no business fighting over there in Europe. "It was the Japanese who attacked us."

If you can get a chance to hear this speech, do so. Warning.. President Roosevelt refers to God and the act of praying many times during this speech. So if you think there is a separation of church and state in America, you may be offended by Democratic President Roosevelt's speech.

(See back in those days, people were more tolerant of religion.)

Questions-2006

Since we are heading up to the end of the year.. I thought this would be a great time to answer some questions that come in.
Most questions come in via comments and we answer them at that point. But some questions are asked in E-mail or the AR- voice mail.. Hot Line phone.
Also this would be a good time to look at the direction The Angry Republican will take in 2006.

First the questions

Q-"Are you really that much of an ass!"

No… I am a bigger ass! Most of the Posts and comments I do are really mean. I have to edit these comments and posts down so they are not so mean. Many times, after removing all the mean stuff, the only thing that is left is.. "Thanks for the comment!"

Q- "You think you are a 'big shot', but you get very few views on your blog. Do you realize no one is reading your stuff?"

Thank you very much for the confidence booster. I am use to it! When I write Newspaper Editorials, sometimes you get no reply at all. You do wonder if anyone is reading. (Kind of the way it is on Blog Spot and Blogger.) But you keep writing. I do not comment much on other people's blogs. This is one of the problems. If you want a lot of views, you need to get out and promote your blog. I do not do this. I have a circle of political people I visit, but I do not venture much further. Plus, I am very opinionated. Some people hate that. I will never be one of the most popular blogs. I am happy being "underground!"

Q- "I own a restaurant and I have a french fryer that keeps turning off in the mornings. We have to reset it 2 or 3 times. What the hell is wrong with it?"

It sounds like the "safety hi-limit" is going bad. What you need to do is probe the grease for a temp when it kicks off in the morning. If the temp, when it kicks out, is less then 350 degrees you probably have a bad Hi-Limit. Cost is anywhere from $60 to $700. Depending on how "High tech" that fryer is. If the temp is higher then 350 when it cuts out, you have a bad thermostat and/or (T-stat system.)

Q- "Are you being paid by the Republican Party and neocons to spread propaganda to bloggers?"

No. I side with the republicans because I have yet to hear a good democratic plan.

Q- "Why is the sky blue?"

Because it is, deal with it.

Q- "Your stuff doesn't suck too bad. Do you write all the stuff for The Blue Funk and A1 Editorials? Do you spend 10 hrs a day writing this crap?"

No, I'm lucky to spend 1 hr a day blogging. Most of that time is spent writing and very little time commenting. I write some stuff for the other sites.. "Uranus" and "Mr. Suck" are my pieces. We are trying to form a political humor web site. That is why we link to each other's sites. Blogster is our home right now. Thanks for saying that we "do not suck too bad!"

Q- "Yea, I got a new water heater. I can't get a male threaded pipe to seal in a female elbow. I use that Teflon tape, freaking thing is still leaking water."

Try using Teflon and Pro Dope. Be careful.. With this much lubricant, you can crack the fitting. If that doesn't work, you have a bad thread. Can you borrow a tap and die set? Chase the threads. If not, get new fittings. The time you are spending trying to seal this old crap, you could have bought new fittings! Many places will cut and thread new pipe for you. It is not that expensive.

Q- "You must of sucked up big time with the new owners to be the first featured blogger with the new format of Blogster."

No. Actually the opposite.. I have never asked to be a featured blogger. (Even with Arthur-AKA-CB) Now, I did welcome the new owners when many were insulting them. But a lot of people did that as well. The article I wrote that got featured came to me as I saw people fighting for the right to swear and show dirty pictures in public. Still, to this day, I think that is a weird thing to fight for. I didn't know I was being featured. I came home from work and went right to my site. A comment, from Cindy, read: "Look at you, big dog, on the Blogster home page…" That's how I found out.

The future of The Angry Republican..

I think 2006 will be a hell of a year for the political channel here at Blogster. I am looking foreword to it! With the upcoming elections, I believe democrats will double their efforts to bring down Bush. It will take a team of us conservative bloggers to sift through all the accusations that democrats will make this year. I am excited to do my part.
I believe a portion of Americans do not see a real enemy out there. They do not feel terrorism is a true threat to America. I will do a series of editorials on the history of radical Islam. I know "A Political Nut", "Ancient One", and others have discussed this topic. I wanted to add my opinion to it. I feel it is just as dangerous as communism and fascism was.
I want to thank everyone who reads The Angry Republican!
I try to mix humor with politics. Sometimes it works.. Sometimes it is crap!
But it is always free!
_______________________________________________________
AR- voice mail- (814) 282-5909
Mailing address- AR, PO Box 976, Meadville Pa, 16335
_______________________________________________________

ALMIGHTY judge

One of the things I had heard people say, who are against the government "eavesdropping." They would feel better if a Judge had to sign a warrant for the wiretap.

I guess this would make them feel better if the CIA Agent had to go to a judge and get a warrant first.

I don't think these people have a realistic view of how that is done. I am just guessing what their view is, I'm trying to understand why they are appalled by a wire tap during a WAR.

Do you think a "shifty" CIA agent walks into a "kindly" judges chambers with one piece of paper in his hands? This "shady" agent asks this judge: (A judge who looks a lot like Jimmy Stewart) "Judge, I need you to sign this!" The wise old judge looks at the young, inexperienced agent and says: "Now.. Now just hold on there.. You hold on a darn minute. I'm not signing anything till I know the facts.. You want to wire tap "Joe America's" phone line? You just better sit right down and prove to me why you need this wire tap."

Is that what you think happens??

A judge signs tons of stuff. Much of it is rubberstamped. I hate to say this, because we like to feel important, but we are just names on a paper. If the judge DOES recognize your name, it is probably not a good thing. It probably means you have a criminal record.

Put yourself in the judges shoes..

You see dozens of these warrants. You sign tons of stuff all the time. You know most of the officers and agents are good people trying to do their jobs and catch crooks.

If the officer or the agent has a clean record, you will probably sign the warrant with no delay. Unless you know the individual on the warrant, you might need to exclude yourself if you feel you would be bias.

Put yourself in the CIA Agents shoes..

You are just trying to do your job. YOU ARE NOT A CROOK. You have a guy that you are sure is communicating with terrorists. You need a wiretap now! Are you going to go to a judge who pisses around, sets the warrant down in a pile, and tells you to come back later? Or are you going to head to a judge who will see you now and sign that warrant?
So what difference will going to a judge be?? It just wastes valuable time DURING WAR.

NOW

Put yourself in the presidents shoes..

Terrorists just killed 3,000 Americans. Members of congress are receiving letters filled with a powder. It could be anthrax! "This is a massive attack!" Bigger then Pearl Harbor! Congress votes to give you the power to attack. The CIA tells you that they believe terror cells in America are communicating with terrorists in other countries. They need your authority to wire tap.

Do you??

A- Tell the CIA to start wire taping now! We must stop this attack!

OR

B- Tell the CIA.. "Hold on now, Ahh.. Americans do not like OTHER people listening to their private conversations.. Aaah.. I think it might violate the Constitution. We better think about this. Aah. You know.. Aaah... People have a right to their privacy... Let's think about this. Can you CIA guys come back tomorrow.."

If your answer is B.. You are lying.

Big Brother

This story, in which liberals have deemed "eavesdropping", is stupid. All we should have to say is.. Congress authorized President Bush to do this in a vote shortly after 9/11. Congress also authorized the invasion of Afghanistan at the same time. If we were dealing with rational people, that would be all that was needed to be said.

But out of power democrats are not rational. They are bloodthirsty.

If I were a democrat.. The first question I would ask is: "The New York Times held this story for one year?? This important story that is making all of us democrats so angry!! The Times held it?" Well, the president told the Times to hold it. "Since when has The New York Times ever done what the president asked?"

If I were a journalist, I would ask: "What is an editorial doing on the front page of The New York Times." This whole story comes from a book some guy has written which will join the ranks of the other "Bash Bush Books" already written.


Being a republican, I am asking why this story was released now? Right after the Iraqi elections. (is The New York Times trying to dampen that history making election?) This front-page editorial is timed just right to influence congress's vote on the Patriot Act.

Folk's.. The simple fact that the Patriot Act has to be voted on every couple years should tell you it is a temporary tool for our government to catch terrorists AND people who help terrorist here in America.
If President Bush is spying on terrorists and he happens to see Harry Reid downloading kiddie porn, I don't think Bush is going to give a rat's ass. Bush may not like the fact that Harry Reid is looking at 7 year old girlie pictures. But this tap is Defined Purpose. Bush could only get Harry Reid if he funneled info or money to terrorists.

The same is true if the FBI was watching the Internet and spotted Ted Kennedy shifting his families fortune from one off-shore account to another. (The Kennedy's have 150 million in off-shore accounts so they do not have to pay American taxes.) The FBI can do nothing about this. Now, if Ted Kennedy put that money into a known terrorists account. BINGO. The FBI would arrest Kennedy.

I want to steal a line from http://bluefunk.blogster.com/.

Hello.. Liberals.. Are you suffering brain damage??
Sorry folks, every so often we have to slow down and let the liberals catch up.
Do you remember Sept 11, 2001. That is when those Bad Terrorists killed 3,000 Americans. Ok, remember the Anthrax scare. I know you can remember this stuff, it just happened a few years ago. Think!! Think really hard. Letters were being sent to members of congress with a white powder in them.

We felt we were under a massive attack… Remember, Osama Bin Laden smiling in that video tape when he talked about the attacks.
I'm glad to hear Bush authorized "eavesdropping." At the time, it looked like terrorists were getting some inside American help.

I think people forget what it was like then. We also had the DC sniper. People were speculating that it could be terrorism.

If the president DIDN'T do some "eavesdropping" I would be very pissed off. Because, if you can remember back to that time, it looked like terrorists were getting inside help. We didn't know how many cells were right here in America. The 9/11 Report STATES THAT terrorists did use the Internet and phone service to transfer monies and information to its cells in America. The Pentagon, CIA, NSA, FBI and Bush would have been negligent if they did not act. No one has come forward with Patriot Act abuse charges, its been 4 years.


I could see democrats getting their panties in a bunch if America was getting hit with terrorism in New York, Chicago, Miami, etc. On a regular basis. Then you could say: "Hey, these guys are "eavesdropping", fighting this war, and terrorists are still bombing our cities."
We both agree, democrat and republican, that terrorists do not like us being in the Middle East. So it stands to reason that terrorists would still like to attack our cities. They are bombing London, Spain, Russia, India, and Israel. SO… WHAT WE ARE DOING IS WORKING!

For a moment, forget democratic talking points.. Forget republican talking points. Ask yourself.. "What freedoms have I lost because of this eavesdropping." Nothing!! Not one damn thing! If you are Harry Reid, you can still down load your kiddie porn. (Just don't let the local police catch you.) If you are Ted Kennedy, you can still funnel your millions in off-shore accounts and be rich forever.
How many times can the Democratic Party "cry wolf" before people do not even listen to them anymore?

Bush is a genius

If just half of the crimes, that the democrats claim Bush did, are true…

Bush would be the greatest mind of our time.

Let's start at the beginning…

Bush went AWOL while serving his country

Forget the fact that there is no evidence proving this. A couple of guys don't remember seeing him for a couple of months. Big Deal! We must just assume it to be true. You have to give Bush credit for being able to go AWOL and not screw up his military record. Many guys have tried and failed. Bush pulled it off. PLUS, he had that pesky CBS News on his ass. But they never caught Bush.

Genius factor… 02%

Bush's IQ after achieving this AWOL and not getting caught- 110-IQ


Stealing the 2000 election

This would not be an easy thing to do. Planning to steal an election. There have always been rumors that JFK had some "strange" help in Illinois. (Mafia) If you were going to fix an election, the Mafia may be able to help.
Bush didn't use the Mafia to steal the 2000 election. He used The United States judicial system. This is an amazing feat. Think about it. The judges had to be placed in the right situation during the Reagan years, waiting there for just the right moment.
Forget the fact that 2 conservative judges voted to keep counting. It was a liberal and an independent judge who turned the tide and voted to stop the count, Bush won.
How could you make a judge, who doesn't belong to your party, so loyal that he would be willing to screw up his whole career?
And Bush got away with this whole 2000 election theft thing.
Brilliant planning!

The Genius factor for this is… 26%

Bush's IQ for planning this theft… 146-IQ level


Big tax cuts for the rich

This crime is truly amazing!! Bush somehow got big tax cuts to the rich.. And Bush hadn't even changed the tax code yet. When democrats were saying, "Big Tax cuts for the rich," the only cut that took place was that little $600 dollar check we received. None of the other tax cuts went into effect. I still do not understand how Bush pulled that off. Giving big tax cuts to his rich buddies and not getting caught. Bush got all of congress to go along with it.
Kudo's Mister Bush- Brilliant!!

The Genius factor for this crime is at least.. 36%

Bush's IQ, to be able to pull this off and not get caught.. 152-IQ level

Lying about WMD's to attack Saddam

Now this is a well thought out crime. No petty con-man could pull this one off. Bush had to somehow get France, Germany, Russia, Britain and a dozen other countries play a long and say Saddam had WMD's. But that isn't the brilliant part.. Bush had to get key democrats to also say Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. But here is the truly profound part.. Bush somehow made Bill Clinton part of this crime way back in 1998. Clinton also said Saddam had WMD's. Clinton couldn't have any loyalties to Bush. So he must have paid Clinton big gobs of money. Or maybe, just maybe.. Bush set Clinton up with Monica. "Think about it!!" I bet Bush handed out truck-loads of cash to make all those democrats say Saddam had WMD's.
Just the planning alone is ingenious!!

For not getting caught with this crime, Bush's Genius factor is…77%

Bush's IQ for thinking of this plan.. 172-IQ level

Rigging Ohio, stealing a second election

Stealing one election would be a triumph. (In an evil kind of way.) But two elections? This is record book material here. Deserving of several "Atta-boys."
It is said that Bush rigged up Ohio voting machine to give him the win. Yet, no machine has ever been dragged into a courtroom as evidence of this crime. Other folks say Bush caused democratic voters to stay home. I can only figure that maybe Bush sent out a bunch of flyers telling democrats that the Tuesday election was moved to Wednesday. This caused many Ohio democrats to stay home.
Another crime that Bush has gotten away with!!

The Genius factor for stealing 2 elections.. 107%

Bush's IQ.. 265-IQ level

Bush ignores hurricane Katrina because he hates Black people

Never mind the fact that FEMA has never been a first responder to any American disaster. Bush wasn't concerned about that. Here is what makes this crime so intriguing. The mayor of New Orleans was a democrat. The governor was also democrat. Bush, because he hates Black people, had to make sure the mayor DIDN'T use the school busses to save people. Bush also had to make sure the democratic governor didn't call in the National Guard.
I figure Bush slipped both of them a mickey. Bush freaking knocked them both out.. Big Time. To comment this crime.

Genius factor… 173%

Bush's IQ.. 375-IQ level


Bush forces Congress to vote to stay the course in Iraq

This one is truly brilliant!! See, many democrats were running around, demanding that troops be reduced or even removed from Iraq. What Bush did was force democrats to vote on it. This pissed the democrats off. "How dare you force us to vote on stuff we were demanding.. We were just talking about troop reduction.. We didn't want to actually do anything about it. We just wanted to talk about it.." the democrats said. So Bush forced them to vote.
Here is the genius.. Bush had no way of knowing how the vote would turn out.. (Or did he?)
I believe that Bush used the Mafia for this one. I think Bush sent a couple of goons to each member of congress.. "You guys better vote to stay in Iraq or we bust your face…" is what those Bush-Mafia goons probably said. Hence.. you have your 403-3 vote to stay the course in Iraq with no timed withdraw.

Genius factor.. 987%

Bush's IQ for pulling all this stuff of and not getting caught.. IQ… 675-IQ level

So… As you can plainly see. For Bush to pull off all these crimes that the democrats claim he did.

He is, without a doubt, the smartest man on the planet.

Who else has an IQ of 675?

The Art Of War

Sun Tzu style

Sun Tzu said:

"Whoever is first in the field and awaits the coming of the enemy, will be fresh for the fight; whoever is second in the field and has to hasten to battle will arrive exhausted. Therefore the clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy's will to be imposed on him."

(Some anti-war people may want to read that passage again!)

A while back, in a comment, someone suggested that Bush and his administration probably hadn’t read "The art of war" by Sun Tzu. This person claimed that things are being handled badly in Iraq, so the folks planning the war couldn’t have studied war.

Well, at the time of the comment, I didn’t know if those people planing the war had read Sun Tzu. I have the answer now. "Yes, many planning this war have read "The art of War."

If you get a newer copy (Printing) of Sun Tzu strategies it will tell you in the foreword many of those who have studied The art of War.

It is amazing how much we have in common with SunTzu strategies. We hold the assessable terrain. Our military can go whereever they want to, whenever they want. The enemy leader is sitting in our prison. (Saddam) The other enemy leader is in a cave somewhere, hiding in fear. (Osama) The enemy defenses have been defeated. (Tanks, planes, etc)

If our military wanted to build a Six Flags amusement park in downtown Baghdad, there is nothing the enemy could do to stop it. The enemy could launch a car bomb at the Baghdad Six Flags, but they could not stop the project.

There are some things we are not doing that Sun Tzu suggests you should do if you are to be victorious. (Liberals are not going to like this.) First, we are not banging a Gong at nighttime. Sun Tzu lived 2,400 years ago and banging a gong was important then. It forces your enemy, even in down time, to remember that you are there. We play loud rock music.. Does that count?

Second, we must make the enemy fear us. The enemy must feel it would be better to die then to be captured by Americans. The enemy must know they will die if they attack us. But.. We do not torture prisoners. Actually we are very kind to the enemy. (Compared to other wars of the past.) This is why many of Saddam’s soldiers surrendered to our military in the early days of the war. They knew they would get hot food and a safe place to sleep.

Third, if we followed Sun Tzu's - The art of war, we would take the enemies supplies. (Oil) We would have taken the billions of dollars Saddam had stashed away. We are not doing that.

Forth: We would never retreat when we hold the main terrain. This would be seen as a sign of weakness. As said by Sun Tzu. The only time you would retreat is if the enemy forces are greater then yours. No one can say that the terrorists have a greater force then our military. Even the most misguided liberal.

I am not suggesting that America start doing these things. We are winning wars without torture and stealing land. I just think it is ironic that someone suggested that Bush and his administration hadn’t studied "The art of war," and if we did follow Sun Tzu strategies we would have to strike fear into the enemy. We would take Saddam’s resources and basically make Iraq the 51 state of America.

Sun Tzu Said:

"Security against defeat implies defensive tactics; ability to defeat the enemy means taking the offensive. Standing on the defensive indicates insufficient strength; attacking, a superabundance of strength. The general who is skilled in defense hides in the most secret recesses of the earth; he who is skilled in attack flashes forth from the topmost heights of heaven. Thus on the one hand we have ability to protect ourselves; on the other, a victory that is complete."

Liberals need Moore??

There’s gold in them there hills!!

This all started by me, deciding to read Michael Moore’s book: "Dude, where’s my country?" My plan was to use the book, (which was published in 2003) to show how wrong various Moore predictions were.

Most of the book is filled with republican stereo-types. I can’t complain about this because I use liberal stereo-types all the time. (Liberals who complain about animal rights while wearing a fur coat.. The dumb guy who says YOU should save gas while he hops into a car and drives to work. Alex Baldwin who says he will leave the country if Bush is elected.. He is still here. Rosie O’Donald telling people they shouldn’t have guns while she hires a bodyguard with a gun. ETC)

I could go on and on about Michael Moore’s wrongful remarks but there would be no point in it. If you are conservative, you do not need me telling you that Moore makes things up. If you are liberal, you will not believe me! I will just share one. Moore claims republicans are self-centered because they want to keep more of their money through tax cuts. Yet, what Moore doesn’t tell you is that the red states, by way of income tax returns, generally give more money to charity then the blue states. "We are self-centered?"

So this book goes on like this.. Tons of stereo-types. Moore give democrats a road map on how to win the 2004 election. (This didn’t work out too good.)

But then.. In the very back of the book.. Buried back where few people have probably ventured. Moore tells you exactly what is wrong with liberals. GOLD MINE!

These are Michael Moore’s own words. I am not making this up. (Pg 178-bottom)

"Liberals have acted and voted conservatively so often that they have redefined the term ‘wimp.’ This is why Americans hate to vote for a liberal. A liberal leader is often an oxymoron- liberals don’t lead, they follow. Conservatives are real leaders. They have courage of their convictions. They don’t bend, they don’t break, and they never give in. They are relentless in pursuit of their ideals. They are fearless and take shit from no one. In other words, they actually believe in something. When was the last time you ran into a liberal or a democrat who stuck to a principle just because it was right. That is why most Americans don’t trust liberals. You never know which way they will bend. With conservatives, what you see is what you get, and in these scary times, that reassurance is comforting to millions."

Now folks, if I said that.. You would comment that I am a "right-wing nut job" and "who cares." But this is Michael Moore! The liberal God!
I’m not done yet..

Moore continues...(pg 189-bottom) Moore is telling you what is wrong with liberal idealism.

"Drugs are bad. They f##k you up, slow you down, and ruin your daily existence."

"Men and women are different. We are not the same."

"Your children do not have a right to privacy and you better pay attention to them."

"SUVs are not inherently evil. Getting back to nature is a bad idea. Nature doesn’t want you anywhere near it. Animals don’t have rights. Ann Coulter is crazy as a loon but she has more balls then the whole Democratic Leadership Council. Nixon was more liberal than the last five presidents. Too many liberals view the religious as superstitious fifteenth-century ignoramuses. We are wrong, and they have as much right to their religion as those among us who have no religion. This arrogance is a big reason the lower classes will always side with republicans."

To be fair to Moore, I did condense this last section to save space. But I didn’t change the meaning or direction. Moore is trying to tell you liberals why you lose elections.

Democrats will not believe this. Or they will claim I took this stuff out of context. Or just maybe they will get the book, (most libraries have it- I marked the pages) and they will see I didn’t use any tricks here. These are Michael Moore’s own words.

Liberals will not listen to a republican like myself. Maybe they will listen to Moore?

Say what you mean, mean what you say. You voted for the war in Iraq, but you do not have the balls to stand behind that vote. (Except Senator Liberman.. He has guts!) Quit trying to make people evil just because they drive a car, or cut down a tree for heat, school books and toilet paper. Stop cutting down the religious. You look arrogant and hypocritical because YOU are suppose to be kind and caring to all.

From what I hear, Moore is putting together another movie that will trash republicans. It, of course, will be strategically released during the 2006 election. It will be filled with the same republican stereo-types as the last Moore film. Democrats will line up and plop down their funds to hear the famous words.. "Bush Lied."

A movie didn’t work in 2004. It will not work now. Moore is just looking for some fast cash and you are the Mac machine. The secret to liberals winning an election was given by Moore in a book called: "Dude, where’s my country." But no liberal will believe it, or use it, or comprehend what it means...

Get Angry!!

Sensing there may be trouble..

The Angry Republican takes a moment to reflect..

They pick on my President, day after day. I must get back at them..

But they do not seem to have any leader..

There must be a way??

I know..

I will use the very words of the man that the liberals seem to listen to.

I will use Michael Moore to defeat the liberals..

Next post.."Liberals need Moore??"

Thanks for reading The Angry Republican!!

SO…You want Freedom?

I have been hearing the word 'freedom' thrown around lately. People talk about the constitution, the right to swear in public and publish dirty pictures. "We must be free!!"

Do you really want to be free??

When we speak about freedom, we usually are very self-centered. We talk about OUR freedoms. What about the freedoms of others? My freedom may disgust you.

Think about it….

You live in a neighborhood filled with many different people. The family, in the house on the right, loves to shoot animals. They shoot dogs, cats, rabbits, basically anything that runs into their yard. But that is what they want to do… They are free.

The people on the left of you are trying to develop a new explosive. Once, every month, they blow up their house. BOOOM! But that is what they want to do… They are free.

The guy across the street rapes women, he has been eyeing your daughter. But that is what he wants to do… He is free.

The people who live in the house behind you play loud music 24 hours a day. They swear all the time. They drink booze and puke all night long. You have noticed your kids watching that house and they are starting to swear. "My kids never swore." But that is what these neighbors want to do.. They are free.

It is impossible to be totally free. We would kill each other. The minute you put a hand on my daughter, I would shoot you. I'm free.. I could do that.

So we have to set rules.. The way our founding fathers have come up with is based on a majority. We the people, do not want to be bothered with voting every week on stupid issues, so we pick representatives to vote for us. They have, and continue to, set forth rules, which protect us from each other. We may not like these rules, but they are designed to protect somebody.

You still are free! Almost every activity that I described in the "wacky" neighborhood could be done somewhere. There is a time and place for everything. The guy who wants to shoot animals.. Most states have a sanctioned "Season" where hunters can shoot certain animals. But you can't shoot off a gun in public areas. It is too dangerous.
They family who is trying to develop new explosives live about 60 miles from my house. They are the Zambelli Family and they develop World Class firework displays.


These guys are always blowing things up.

When they are trying to develop a certain color or training new technicians, they shoot fireworks off all the time. But they have the proper licenses and they work a safe distance from causing danger to you and I.

When I was younger, they was an old farmhouse that was called "Animal House." People drank all night, music was as loud as it could be. No one ever called the cops because the house was far enough away. It didn't bother anyone.

The neighbor who want to rape women.. There is no hope for this guy.. We the people have deemed this activity wrong. But, even he could head off to Vegas and pay a hooker to play along with his twisted wishes.
So in America, you are free. But we have rules to protect each other. There is a time and a place for everything.


Even if your freedom is blowing things up!!

Real Deal

We have arrived at the time of the year when we should give thanks for all that we have. Unfortunately, this is also the time of the year when millions of school kids are fed a malicious piece of propaganda called: "The first Thanksgiving."
It will take YEARS for a child to un-learn this "history lesson." Some never do. They will grow up with this perverted view of the first settlers in The New World.
In case you forgot the old school version of The First Thanksgiving.. Here it is…
A bunch of pilgrims land here in the New World. They are stupid and white. They have no idea how to feed themselves and they spend all day praying to God. The pilgrims throw a party called: Thanksgiving. But they don't have enough food. A Native American named Samoset, who speaks English (Because Native Americans are far more advanced then the stupid white people) spies the pitiful pilgrims. He snaps his fingers… Deer and turkey arrive ready to eat. Everybody feasts.
Then the pilgrims KILL the Native Americans and take their land.
That is the First Thanksgiving.
This is so far from the truth, but many American kids learn this crap and it can haunt them for the rest of their life.
The early settlers had many Harvest Feasts. As corn or wheat matured and was ready to be 'put up.' Settlers would have a huge meal. If the hunters bagged more game then the pilgrims could use, they would have a feast. Native Americans were welcome at many of these feasts.
The first feasts took place on Roanoke Island. 1585. What the English settlers couldn't grow was supplied by ship. This was the pet project of Sir Walter Raleigh and Queen Elisabeth I. There was trading between the settlers and the Native Americans. England kept this colony well stocked until the war with Spain. The colony then disappeared.
This is where many people are confused. Some history teachers seem unwilling to define this fact:
"White settlers and friendly Native Americans never really had any problems with each other." Their relationship was mutually beneficial. Native Americans taught the settlers how to grow potatoes and corn. The white settlers helped fight off the savages. Savages were the enemy of both the settlers and friendly Native Americans. Savages were nomadic tribes who stole, raped and murdered the friendly Natives, years before white settlers arrived. The settlers had musket riffles, this was magic to the natives.
White settlers took Native Americans to England. Not as slaves, as guests. They both tried to learn each other's language. Together, they fought off the savages and both prospered in the New World.
There was one harvest feast that was recorded, many, many years after the time period I was just speaking about. Many historians believe this is where the "First Thanksgiving" schoolbook version comes from. Governor William Bradford declares a feast to give thanks to God for their first harvest. October 1621.
During this feast, the settlers invited 3 prominent natives. There was a misunderstanding and the whole tribe showed up. (87 Natives) There was not enough food to feed all the settlers and Indians. BOTH settlers and Natives headed for the woods and returned hours later with 4 deer and 2 turkeys for the feast. This would be a better example of the first 'pot luck' dinner then how it is represented today as the First Thanksgiving with white settlers not preparing enough food. But this isn't the FIRST feast between whites and natives. The first meeting took place almost a hundred years earlier.
Let me stop for a moment.. In no way am I trying to belittle the contributions of Native Americans to the early settlement. It would have been near impossible to settle North America, at that time, without the help of friendly Natives.Also, I am not talking about Western Expansion of America. That was a war and a land grab that took place much later.
I am not trying to paint a picture of a paradise between White settlers and Native Americans. Yes, there were white settlers that didn't trust any Natives. They did some evil things. Also, there are stories of savages dressing up like friendly Natives and attacking the pilgrim towns. Killing innocent people.
I just hate this version of the First Thanksgiving that depicts the white settlers as stupid people who came to American and had no idea how to survive. It isn't the truth. They were brave pioneers and many died trying to settle North America. You do them and Friendly Natives an injustice when you tell the story this way.
The REAL Thanksgiving
The first feast took place on Roanoke Island. 1585. Picture John White drawing sketches of the natives. He drew hundreds, like he would never see these natives again. Most of the food for the meal came from off the ship. But the friendly Croatian Natives brought corn and fresh turkey. Neither could understand each other, but they used a type of sign and drawings. Richard Grenville points out into the ocean, showing a Croatian where the explorers came from. As one of the three ships readies to sail back, two natives board the ship for England. These Croatians have never ventured out further then the eye can see. Now they are heading on a journey that will last 22 days. They will see wonders no native has ever dreamed.
Back on Roanoke, Croatians show the settlers all the splendors of the New World. A bond is formed on that day which will last for generations between white settlers and friendly natives.

Who is Angry??

You write the caption!!

You already know this photo will sail around liberal blogs with many different captions.

What can we have Bush saying??

If you come up with something funny.. We will put it on the picture. (and give you credit for the comment.)

SURRENDER??

Rep. John Murtha's call to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq within six months is coming to a vote.

Tonight, the House of Representatives are voting on if we should stay in Iraq. (11/18/05) They are meeting right now. It has been said that we may know the results as soon as 9 pm (eastern time.)

There are some in congress who want a FULL pull-out of our troops from Iraq now. Others believe this is paramount to surrender.

I tried this today when I talked to some liberal friends I know at work. Ask a liberal if they support the surrender of Iraq to the terrorists. You will get a knee-jerk reaction from them. "We are not surrendering, why… We are just bringing our troops home!"

Of course I like to push things a tad bit and ask: "If you are fighting someone and they give up and go home, would you say that you won the fight?"

Of course this is when liberal brainwashing comes in and they begin to stutter and falter. They say things like: "Well, if I was fighting someone and it was a tough battle and they gave up.. I might not consider it a victory." This is of course pure BS. If someone packs up and goes home.. YOU WIN!

But unfortunately, the ones surrendering might be Americans. Just when terrorists are screwing things up. Just last night, terrorists tried to car bomb a hotel where Western reporters stay. Terrorists completely missed the hotel and blew up a side building. No reporters were injured. We all heard about the suicide bombers in Jordan. I guess they were not aiming for the wedding party. A pair of suicide bombers detonated explosive belts Friday inside two Shiite mosques in the northern Kurdish town of Khanaqin, collapsing the buildings, killing at least 70people.

They are blowing up their own people!

I am not really worried by this vote tonight. More then likely it will result in some sort of meeting in the middle. Republicans will force the issue that leaving Iraq now.. IS SURRENDER. What member of congress wants to go down in recorded history voting for surrender? NO.. there will be quarterly war reports. Detailed progress reports. And maybe some end of war timeline.

The GOP-led Senate this week defeated a Democratic proposal to require President Bush to offer a timetable to withdraw troops from Iraq. The Senate eventually passed a statement saying 2006 "should be a period of significant transition to full Iraqi sovereignty" to offer the phased withdrawal.

The vote is in.. 403 - 3. Only three in congress voted for surrender to the terrorists. My faith in our political system is restored. With all the screaming from democrats that Bush lied. That Iraqi's don't want us there.. I was worried this might be closer.

I think we hit on something. If you ask a democrat if they want to surrender to the terrorists, they quickly say NO.. They have been brainwashed by liberals to think if we pack up and leave Iraq now, we could still call it a victory. You can't have it both ways….Biff…

White Phosphorus

FALLUJAH 2004: White phosphorous rounds, used for decades by gunners, lit up the night sky in last year's pitched battle.REUTERS TV

I am, and have always been a civilian. I have an excuse for not knowing what White Phosphorus was. This story came out of nowhere for me and I had to take a crash course on the stuff.

I have seen a post where liberals, who have served in the military, claim to know all about this stuff. They learned about it while they were in the military. They talked about how horrible WP is and how we shouldn't be using it.

I have some questions..

"Why didn't you do something about White Phosphorus way back then?" When you first heard about it. "Why now?" If you are that concerned.. Why did you wait until now?

Don't try and say you didn't know the military was still using it. I never heard about White Phosphorus until this story broke. It only took me several minutes to find information about how and why the US military uses it. You are suppose to be the anti-war = "Goodie-guys." Why didn't you do something? Why didn't you write your congressmen. Do editorials in the paper. Make people aware.

Were you upset when it was used as a smoke screen during the Clinton years? The military has used WP for decades.

The answer is very obvious.. Because no liberal reporter told you democrats to be angry during the Clinton years when White Phosphorus was used as a smoke screen. But now.. A liberal reporter did a story, which sparked a brain cell and now you are concerned.

So now we will attack the military for using WP, to get at President Bush.

People… I'm getting really tired of these "Butt-heads." (We call them Butt-heads because everything they say is punctuated with- BUT.) They say things like: "I support the troops BUT, I do not support the war." The Butt-heads say: I love America, BUT, I don't like what it stands for today." Or how about the ever popular.. Liberal Motto: "I love the military, BUT, they are using WP and torturing POW's, and causing the terrorists to hate America." You just start getting sick of freaking Butt-heads.

You do realize that Saddam's defense, in his upcoming trial, will have many shared ideas you stupid liberals are pointing out. They are probably taping CNN right now to play it in court. Saddam's defence will be that this was an illegal war. (LIE) That Bush lied. (Another Lie) That the Americans used WP. (WP is not an illegal weapon) That they tortured prisoners. All the stuff that you people are helping to come to light.

I am beginning to believe our biggest enemy isn't in a Middle Eastern Desert. The enemy is right here in America. It is the party that is out of power. They are so desperate to regain power, they are willing to aid the enemy….Biff…

More Bird Flu

I know I said I was not going to make fun of Bird Flu again. But, I can't resist. It is like someone addicted to booze. I say I will not make fun of Bird Flu. But then I see a picture.. I can't help myself…

PEOPLE IN ASIA TRAIN FOR TREATING SICK BIRDS..

I think I need to start a twelve-step program. I need help!

Step one: Admit I am powerless over stupid Bird Flu. My life has become unmanageable.

Step two:……..

Who are we?

The Angry Republican specializes in editorials, politics and crap.

The sick minds behind this stuff are Biff Babonie and Truth Master B

ALSO comments by:

Dr Needlelick and The Blue Funk

BIRD FLU UPDATE

We finally have pictures of a sick bird. You may want to take your small children and place them into another room. I will warn you. This picture is VERY graphic. We will show you not only the exterior of the poor sick bird, we will take you inside the evil bird.

It turns my stomach. Just the thought of these pictures is making me want to chuck right now. BUT… In the interest of science… These photos must be seen by all.

Many people have pet birds. YOU WILL NEED TO KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR. These disgusting photos just may save your life.

I hope your small children are out of the room.. Here we go…

WARNING SIGNS OF A SICK BIRD……..


You will notice the extra big head. Super-sized feet. The skeleton of this sick bird is completely deformed.

If you see a bird like this. GET AWAY.

You know, I hate bird flu. Bird Flu pisses me off. I hate it. I hate it. I hate it. I hate it. I hate it.

Your chances of being hit by a bus are far greater then catching bird flu in America. You have better odds winning the lottery AND getting hit by lightning on the same day.. Then getting bird flu in America.

BUT, (since I am the only person making fun of bird flu) I have decided to stop making fun of bird flu. I'm getting paranoid.

We have 20 million doses of Tamiflu being readied here in America. 7 billion dollars being spent to ready our hospitals for an epidemic with about 300 million doses of Tamiflu ready by 2007. There are no worries!! If you have an inside bird, it is not going to get Bird Flu. It would have to be exposed to a sick bird. If you have chickens, turkeys or you feed wild birds. WASH YOUR HANDS after being around birds. We will be fine.

The Awakening ..part two..

Who could defend a person like Scooter Libby? Ben Stein gave it a shot. He said:
"…You know something? You know something? If you—I hope I‘m not excessively criminal person, but if you—if you were giving me 30, 40, 50 phone calls a day, conversations with people, then called me in before a grand jury and said to recount what happened in each of those conversations two years later, I‘m sure you would catch me in 700 inconsistencies…"
Hearing this kind of lit a fire under my butt. I will bring it closer to home. You pick any blogger and ask them what they wrote in a post two months ago. WORD FOR WORD. This is stupid! Libby is being charged for lying about a crime that didn't happen. Plame was not in the field at the time of the leak and her husband, Wilson, had already told many people his wife worked for "the agency." It was known around DC.
But let’s take the kid gloves off. This has very little to do with Scooter Libby. People have been trying to bring down President Bush since the beginning. The Bush tax cuts were going to cripple the economy. The 9/11 report was going to show that Bush could have stopped the terrorist attack. The Downing Street memo was going to prove Bush lied. Now Fitzgerald is going to uncover that intelligence was perverted to take us to war with Iraq. Sounds a little like "The sky is falling"- Chicken Little is what the democrat's sound like!
I have one question..
An American Senators job is...
Vote the way the president wants. Look at only information the president gives them. A senator never questions the president.
OR..
A senator job is to check the president. Question presidential decision. Review facts independent from the president's facts.
Our founding fathers would probably tell you that number two is the correct choice. (That is the way they designed it.)
99 out of 100 senators voted to give Bush the authority to attack Iraq. Democrats want you to believe they only used Bush’s intelligence. Plus, they didn’t think Bush would remove Saddam. Wait.. They should have known better. Democrats are the ones who talk about doing something and never do it. Republicans usually say they will do something.. Then they do it.
Any one of those senators, who are so concerned now, could have stopped this back then. Do you know why 99 senators voted to give Bush the power to attack Iraq. BECAUSE THEY BELIEVED Saddam was a threat. Why else would they vote the way they did?
Democrats hope that you will forget how they voted. They hope you forget what they said about Saddam and the threat that he was. You are suppose to forgive the senators because they were caught up in the moment and relied on intelligence of that time. Bush doesn't get this forgiveness because HE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN. Bush should have went forward in time, by way of time travel, and seen the outcome.
Democrats have no solutions.. "Ask them." I ask liberals what their solution is. The answer I get is.. "I don't know.. But we shouldn't have went to war." They only thing they can do is repeat over and over.. "Bush Lied.." If they say it enough.. People may believe it. And it could be working??
Lucky for us.. Bush is not running for reelection. This whole democratic effort is futile.
To prove that Bush lied to take us to war, you will have to find someone who will testify that they told Bush that Saddam had no WMD’s. The problem is... For every ONE person you find, there are three honest people who will tell you that, at that time (2001), they were not sure if he had chemical weapons. Or how far along Saddam was on nuclear weapons. People believed Saddam had enough "Yellow cake" to make a radioactive ‘dirty bomb."
This is the problem.. People are trying to use information we have today and apply it to 2001. Hell, we wouldn’t have this info if we didn’t remove Saddam. The democrat's major form of ammunition COMES FROM the fact that we removed Saddam. Isn't that ironic! They wouldn't have this information if Saddam was still in power. UN inspectors were afraid to be in Iraq.
To believe this war is unjust. You must believe Saddam could be trusted. HE NEVER COULD BE TRUSTED. Not from day one. For 11 years the United Nations tried to get Saddam to follow UN rules. He never did. His military would regularly shoot at our pilots. Saddam had French made missile launchers. Russian rockets with a range of 150 miles. Why do people believe Saddam could never get Nuclear weapons? Iran is working on them. Korea has them. Pakistan has them. India has nukes. Saddam was getting billions of dollars from the oil for food scandal. Saddam kicked the UN inspectors out. I think a person is foolish to believe Saddam could be trusted. He is no longer a problem now, he is in prison. Just except this and move on.
Every time Saddam gets a new lawyer, Iraqi’s kill the lawyer. They have no love for Saddam and they do not want him to have a fair trial. Saddam never gave the Iraqi's a fair trial. So the people of Iraq are killing Saddam's lawyers. This should tell you something. (If you have any 'good' intelligence.)…Biff…

Bush- The awakening!

Finally, President Bush is waking up and defending the choices he made.

President Bush, in the most forceful defense yet of his Iraq war policy, accused critics Friday of trying to rewrite history and charged that they're undercutting America's forces on the front lines.

"The stakes in the global war on terror are too high and the national interest is too important for politicians to throw out false charges," the president said in his combative Veterans Day speech.

"While it's perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began," the president said.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who ran unsuccessfully against Bush last year, quickly challenged the president's charges.

"I wish President Bush knew better than to dishonor America's veterans by playing the politics of fear and smear on Veterans Day," said Kerry, who voted in 2002 to give Bush the authority to wage war but later voted against additional funds for Iraq and Afghanistan reconstruction. Kerry argued at the time that Bush didn't have a solid plan to restore peace.
"This administration misled a nation into war by cherry-picking intelligence and stretching the truth beyond recognition," Kerry said.

Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., said, "It's deeply regrettable that the president is using Veterans Day as a campaign-like attempt to rebuild his own credibility by tearing down those who seek the truth about the clear manipulation of intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war."

I used the term: "Rewriting History" a while back in a post about anti-war protesters. They are trying to change FACTS to make it look like every war America has been involved in was unjust. Even WWII.
This stuff has got me so angry.. I am heading off into the other room to write a post about this stuff…Biff…

Get Angry!

Now you can "Get Angry!"

Want to yell at The Angry Republican and typing words in a comment just will not do it?

Now you can yell directly at me…

1(814)282-9509

This number connects you to The Angry Republican.



Note…

We are not selling anything!! This site is free. So is the phone service. HOWEVER, this is not one of those fancy 1-800 numbers. It is not a toll-free call. You may get hit with a long distance charge, (Depending on your phone service.) We are not charging you a thing. We do not use your number for anything.

If I am out working my ass off, you will get a pre-recorded message telling you about stuff I'm working on. You can leave a message if you would like to. Sometimes, a living-breathing human being will answer the phone.

Thanks to everybody who has visited The Angry Republican! I sure am thankful for the comments…Biff…

Bias

You would think by now that I would be use to the way things get reported. "A certain SLANT" in the news. But it still blows my mind.
Read these two headlines.. (I'm not making this up) Both come from the wire. One is USA Today, the other is AFX…

USA TODAY. Democrats won hotly contested governor's races Tuesday in Virginia and New Jersey on an Election Day closely watched for hints of how the 2006 races might shape up. Tim Kaine and ...

NEW YORK (AFX) - Billionaire Michael Bloomberg has been elected for a second term as mayor of New York City, following a campaign notable for the incumbent's lavish use of his personal fortune. The Republican ...
When the mainstream media are talking about a democratic victory, it is a "hotly contested" win that was "closely watched" for OF COURSE, signs of things to come in 2006.

But when the media talks about a republican victory, there is no talk about things to come in 2006… Instead, we are reminded that he is "BILLIONAIRE" Michael Bloomberg. And this statement is the killer… "… campaign notable for the incumbent's lavish use of his personal fortune…"

Are they saying people in New York City are so stupid that they would vote for anyone, just because they saw a bunch of commercials on TV. Bloomberg didn't win because he is better, he won because he spent more money. This is ridiculous!!

I thought by now with CBS News ratings in the toilet for slanting the news, CNN heading down in ratings for leaning left and of course The New York Times basically working for the DNC, SOMETHING would change?? Not yet I guess.

I know democrats get confused and wonder why conservative / republicans speak so loud and cut down the mainstream media. But this is just one example of the thousands of reports I see out there. It is like being on a golf team and the other team is given this HUGE handi-cap.
Republicans, don't take this stuff to heart. Get a thick skin.. Keep your head high. You will see dozens of reports like this one in the weeks to come. Don't let it get you down. Most Americans now see the left leaning slant in the media. That is why the ratings are slipping for CNN, NBC News, CBS News, MSNBC, etc…Biff…

France dictate morals to America?

For the tenth day in a row, it is dangerous to be WHITE at night in France. I have put off doing a post about the violence in France, mainly because I make fun of France every chance I get. I hate to kick someone when they are down. There is no sport in it.

However, there is an important lesson here. The lesson is that appeasement never works. It just puts off the inevitable for a while. Liberals are very fond of appeasement. It has become France's motto. "Just turn your head, don't say anything, don't look the bad guys in the eyes. They will go away. THIS DOESN'T WORK!

In protest.. Citizens of France hold a silent march… "A silent march?"

Silent because the French do not want to offend anyone.
This whole thing started because the French police were chasing two young people. The two Muslim youths ran into a power substation and were electrocuted. Clearly an accident. This started the riots. Bigger problems lurk here…

As in liberal New Orleans, the French liberals believe that if you over-tax the rich and give welfare checks to the poor, you have done a righteous deed. Warehousing poor people, living on welfare, in depressed neighborhoods. This creates a hotbed for violence. You know what they say about idle hands….

Whenever a conservative suggests getting able-bodied people off of welfare and out in the workforce, we are shouted back. "Those neo-cons do not care about the poor.. They only care about the rich.. They want to take away welfare…" Actually.. we do care about the poor. That is exactly why we want them to work.

I am convinced that many liberals, who speak the loudest about the poor, have never been poor. For if you were ever poor, then you would know welfare enslaves people. It is the poor bastard who goes out and gets the job at Burger King for $5.50 an hour. Fast forward 5 years and that guy is manager of Burger King- second shift. In the daytime he attends collage. Fast forward five years and he has entered society as a middleclass American.

The liberal solution.. Tax the rich even more! Then you can hand out welfare checks of all kinds. Penalize those of us who do well so you can reward those who do not. Create a whole generation of people who do not understand the value of a dollar and the worth of a HARD day's work. People who do not value YOUR property. Do not understand right from wrong.

These are the problems facing France. Years of appeasement coupled with welfare. France has painted a very pleasing picture of what THEY think they are. But now we see behind that pretty picture. Never more should liberal France dictate morals to America.

We should feel sorry for France. Because they are years ahead of us. In liberalism. This is a path we must not take.

You cannot appease evil deeds and warehouse the poor in ghettos. Those who do evil things should be brought to justice. Those who can work.. Should.

'Snowman'... Sex Ed TV???

One of the hottest-selling T-shirts around the country shows a simply drawn snowman with a menacing expression.It's not Frosty's evil twin. The image popularized by drug-dealer-turned-rapper Young Jeezy symbolizes those who sell a white substance known on the street as snow: cocaine.
I guess I do not see the big deal here. Most people will not know what the shirt means. Those who do have probably already been corrupted. My biggest problem is the shirt sucks. Who freaken drew that snowman?

Come on people, this is America! If your going to have a cocaine snowman.. Come on! We have some talented artists out there that could have done a much better job.

------------------------------------------------------------

At the University of California at San Diego, the student government and school TV station are facing off on televised sex. SRTV is airing graphic programs produced by senior Steven York, one of which shows him having sex with a porn actress."This material right there, that we're producing, is for a specific audience. And you know people are going to be offended, but at the same time, that's sort of the college experience," York said.

University rules states that SRTV can air "indecent" but not "obscene" material. Station manager Tiffany Wrapp backs York."Personally, I don't think sex is something that should be censored," Wrapp said.But students at the public university feel differently.

"I am embarrassed and I am outraged," said one at a student meeting. The student government voted to ban the show last week, but York did more than ignore them. Hours after the ban, SRTV ran the sex video again, this time with the face of a female student senator superimposed on the face of the porn star.

"They said, Well, this isn't illegal, it is just inappropriate.' And I said, that is really in the eye of the beholder. You know the students I talked to don't really think it is inappropriate," York said.When asked if one of California's top state schools planned to discipline any of the students involved or pull the plug on porn, the chancellor's office said, "We are not in the business of bigfooting our students ... we'll let them handle it.

"So the collages station manager feels its OK to show sex on a collage run TV channel. The chancellor of the collage says he will let the students handle it. The students are the ones complaining that it is offensive.

Correct me if I'm wrong. Students pay the tuition. It costs tons of money to attend a collage. "Liberals, what does showing sex with a prostitute have to do with higher education? What the hell are you doing to my collages?"

There is an old saying: "If you want freedom, you must police yourself. If you do not, someone will do it for you.

"Collages enjoy quite a bit of freedom. But they are abusing it. I don't mind you standing next to me. I guess I can't stop you from pissing on America. But if some of it lands on my shoes….

Liberals- "You better get a hold of this nutjob called The University of California at San Diego. They are going to screw things up for everybody.Not to mention the brainwashing it is doing to our youths. The lower standards. Moral decay.

Out of power and Out of control

I believe the party that is out of power is out of control. This constant tearing down of an American president is killing this country. I do not mind so much the "talking heads" on TV or even the radio talk show hosts getting little jabs in. I'm not talking about Bloggers either. I think we would miss not commenting on politics. I would!

But when former presidents take part in the slander. It has gotten out of hand. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are crossing the line. These two are airing America's dirty laundry for the world to see. Most former American Presidents had dignity. Not these two tired democrats. They take a swipe at Bush any chance they can get. Carter and Clinton are burning down the house they have to live in. AND THEY DO NOT CARE!

When President Carter was in trouble during his presidency. Americans were being terrorized by Iran. Oil prices sky rocketed. You had to wait in line to get gas. Nixon and Ford could have beamed Carter over the head with nasty comments. But they didn't do that. Do you liberals know why? It is called respect for a sitting president.

When Clinton was lying under oath and being impeached. Bush 41 REFUSED to utter a single negative word in public. Can liberals grasp why Bush 41 would do that? It is called love of country. It is called taking the high road.

You would think a former president would do things to help this country. Instead, Carter and Clinton are promoting negative gossip like two old ladies. YES GOSSIP! Liberals may not know this but in America you are innocent until proven guilty. Cheney, Rove and Libby are innocent, as it stands right now. Liberals are confused..

You ask why democrats lose elections? Because they lack dignity. They listen to people like George Soros- "Move On. Org." Soros tells Americans that we should pay more taxes. He is the 25 richest man in America.. YET.. Most of his money is in off-shore banks. He pays very little taxes for being 25 richest person in America. Liberals listen to Ted Kennedy. "A politician for the people." His family fortune is also mostly off-shore. Out of 500 MILLION dollars, the Kennedy's paid only $ 140,000 in taxes. That's sad. The big money-democratic party wants YOU to pay more taxes. But they don't pay more taxes.

Well, if you liberals want to pay more taxes, go ahead. Just cross off your "personal deduction" on the 2005 tax form. You will pay about $3,000 more in taxes. "If that is what you want to do?"

"Will Bill Clinton cross off his personal deduction and pay more taxes?? I wonder??

John McCain- The perfect storm

There is a storm brewing. A perfect storm for some. A disaster for others. This perfect storm is John McCain.

I have heard many people at Blogster mention how they would like to see a third party enter into this monopoly called the two party system. If McCain splits from the Republican Party, we may see a viable third party. Will he split? Will 2008 be the year McCain has had enough?

There are no indications at this point that McCain would leave the Republican Party. But it is no secret that John McCain has a desire to be president. He has had one major problem. He is middle of the road. Too conservative to be a democrat. Too liberal to be nominated in the Republican Party.

If McCain became an independent, he would be a formidable foe. I have talked to many people who want to vote democrat, but they do not want to vote for Hillary Clinton. Believe it or not, I have heard some republicans grumbling lately. If republicans nominate someone like Jeb Bush, there could be a bolt of conservatives to an independent candidate.

John McCain would not have an easy road ahead if he chose to split. First off, lack of funds. This has been the problem with any third party candidate. McCain would never be able to compete with the Big Two on campaigning and advertising. But, McCain has had no problem getting his message out. He can walk onto David Letterman’s show anytime. Even John Stewart gives McCain respect. He could travel around doing local and national talk shows for as long as they will have him. The liberal side of the media seems to like John McCain. (That is until they see him as a threat to Hillary Clinton.)

Another problem John McCain would face: He would have to be everything to everybody. He could never make a mistake. The Big Two would step on him. He could never say: “I voted for the 87 billion before I voted against it.” McCain could never enter a debate mumbling: “It’s hard.. Politics is hard.. It’s just hard work.. We are working hard...” John McCain would have to hit his mark every time.

Since Blogs are all about personal opinion.. You may be wondering if I could ever vote for McCain. The answer is yes. If he becomes the republican nomination I would vote for him. If John McCain ran as an independent, it would have to be the perfect storm. If republicans ran Jeb Bush and McCain was speaking more conservative then Bush, I could vote for the independent McCain. Let Me Explain...

There is nothing wrong with Jeb Bush. He is probably a nice fellow. I have only minor problems with the current president. I believe George Bush has handled the war on terrorism well. Bush has tried to stick to many campaign promises. I do not agree with the spending. But I see why it is happening. My major problem is that president Bush still acts like he is running for president. This administration has never acted like a majority. President Bush spends too much time trying to make liberals like him.Just the name “Bush” has become so stigmatized to middle America, I do not believe ANY ONE with the name BUSH can win in 2008. Again, Jeb Bush is probably a great person. He is young enough to be able to run in the future. There is no need to run Jeb in 2008. There are too many qualified republican candidates out there to gamble an important election on obtaining a Bush family presidential dynasty. (Besides, if republicans ran Jeb Bush, liberals wouldn’t have to change their “I hate Bush” bumper stickers. Why make it easy on them? Make liberals print up new stickers.)

I have spent the last two posts on possibilities for the 2008 presidential race. There is, of course, the “Slug-Fest.... Mud Slinging contest” coming up in 2006. The Big Two will out-due themselves this time fighting for a few important congressional seats. “If you think other countries have a bad opinion of America now... Wait until the 2006 attack ads hit the airwaves.” The 2006 election will make even the most fanatical political addict hate politics.

But... I think the 2008 presidential race will be one of the most exciting races in the last half a century…Biff…

Halloween Special

THE TRUE WITCH TRIALS

For years liberals have told us how evil religions burned poor innocent girls at the steak as witches. We were told this happen right here in America. As always, liberals are wrong again.

In Europe, thousands of women (and some men) were killed. In America.. 0 women were burned as witches. First- America wasn’t a country yet, this was the 1600's. Second- on this continent, witches were hanged. One guy had rocks piled on him because he wouldn’t go to court. He died because the weight crushed his chest.

All and all, in the famous Salem witch trials, two dozen people were jailed as witches. Maybe 20 were put to death. All received a trial. (Not the type of trial we have today.. People didn’t have a defense attorney. Nobody did back then unless you had big bucks.)

Now.. The part liberals do not want you to know about. The witch trials had less to do about religion, and more to do about revenge. When Europeans arrived here there was a sense of lawlessness. People use to beat the crap out of each other. To help curb this, the courts and sheriff’s persuaded town folks to sue each other instead of fighting. The courts were filled with people airing their dirty laundry. You could be sued for walking on someone’s property.

Many historians now believe the witch trials were a way of getting back at people who sued too many other people. If a person was being tried as a witch and the town's people didn’t care for them, they would show up at the trial and act possessed. They would help convict the so-called witch.

Another thing liberals do not want you to know and collage professors will not teach you.. Christianity condemned any type of belief in witches and a practice of Halloween in general. The puritans who were condemning the witches were an off-chute of the majority religion. An outcast, if you will.

So.. This is another boat-load of crap that liberals tried to stick into my brain when I was in school. Facts completely twisted to prove religion is a ‘bad thing.’ I, for one, am on a mission to debunk this liberal crap. People need to know the true history of the world. Not the slanted version liberals feed us. With conservatives joining the ranks of collage professors, this out of balanced 70% liberal school system is doomed.

What do the witch trials teach me ?... In America, we stopped this nonsense very quickly. But in Europe, they allowed the witch hunts to go on for years.. Killing thousands of innocent people. This proves to me America has and will always be the better place to live. Also, had people listened to Christianity back then, the witch trials wouldn’t have taken place....Biff..

P.S.- If you want to find out more about topics like this. The History Channel is showing two programs which gives info.. The show- The History of Haunted Halloween tells of Christianity condemning any belief in witches and Halloween. The History of the Salem Witch trials is another great source.

Holiday for Liberals..Merry Fitzmas

Well, so it happened… The day liberals have been waiting for. BUT.. It isn't exactly what they wanted. Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's first charges in the White House leak case don't get to the heart of his two-year probe: the leak.
The indictment of vice presidential adviser I. Lewis "Scooter' Libby Jr. is built on charges of obstruction of justice, making false statements and perjury — and it will rest primarily on testimony from a handful of Washington reporters.

As Nixon once said.. "The cover-up is bigger then the crime." However, we still do not know if a crime has been commented. Libby has not been charged with anything. "Did liberals miss again?" You know they wanted Cheney.. Oh..Boy. Or maybe Rove.. Or the mother load.. Bush himself. Kind of reminds you of Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd.

I have a prediction.. (see.. liberals never think that far down the road.. They make it very easy for us republicans.) When things do not go right in this investigation and liberals do not see Rove and Cheney charged. They will blame that whole thing on Fitzgerald. Remember, it was a republican- Ashcroft who selected Fitzgerald for this independent counsel. Liberals were crying about that two years ago. Hillary Clinton was one of the democrats telling us that Fitzgerald couldn't be fair, couldn't be trusted. Well Hillary, you are wrong again.

But the sad thing is.. After all that Fitzgerald has done. (And being a republican, I would say Fitzgerald has been fair.) If Rove or Cheney are not charged with something, liberals will turn on him and beat the crap out of Fitzgerald.


Liberals do not care about right and wrong. They do not care about a fair trial. They have hated Bush from day one and have never stopped trying to pin something on him.

The big news today is the 'oil for food scandal.' This story is really heating up and the mainstream media doesn't seem to care about that corruption……

Patrick Fitzgerald

"Let's see… How could I make myself look more like a dork? This Santa hat is working well! Maybe I should wear a bow-tie?"

Hillary verses 'C-Note'

America may finally get it’s first female president. But who will it be? Hillary or Condi.

Though the DNC and the RNC are being very tight lipped about the whole drama. There is no doubt that this scenario could take place. The rumor from the right is that with President Bush’s approval rating so low, no republican male could beat Hillary Clinton. The rumor from the left is that the RNC is grooming Condi Rice for the position with all this “good will” globe-trotting she is doing.

Neither Hillary nor Condi will admit the desire to entering the 2008 race for the presidency. Who would at this point in time? If either would announce a bid now, the opposition would have three years to tear them down.

There are a few problems... To be fair to my liberal readers, I will start with Condi Rice first.

Condi Rice has never once shown any signs of emotion. It is quite possible that Condi is a Volcan. To counter this, the RNC is forcing Condi to watch 5,000 hours of Oprah and Dr. Phil. She must watch until she cries or giggles like a little girl.

Hillary has some problems to. When Hillary is giving a speech and she gets worked up. She sounds like a wounded great horned owl. The DNC is hard at work to fix this problem. Surgeons will remove this section of Hillary’s brain. Americans will never have to hear the famous Hillary screech again.

There is another problem with Condi. How do I put this and still be politically correct. Hmmm... There are those in the African-American community who believe Condi Rice isn’t Black enough. Some say she doesn’t remember where her roots are. To counter this the RNC has hired Snoop Dogg, Lil’Kim and Puffy P Diddy Daddy P Puffer P Daddy to teach Condi a few things. During a few speeches in 2007, Condi Rice will call herself: “C-Note”. She will start out several key speeches by saying: “What up dogg! Yall kick back while I fazzle my jazzle.” Then Condi will slap her backside and ask the crowd.. “Can you handle this?”

Hillary has some changes in store to. All that Whitewater, file-gate, bank-gate, dead friends, cheating husband, swearing, firing servants and lesbian stuff that republicans like to bring up. To counter this the DNC is working on a mind erasing laser ray.

WHO WILL WIN THE PRESIDENCY IN 2008

We feel that Condi Rice will win the swim suit competition. However, Hillary has experience. She has lived in the White House, she knows where all the rooms are. No one will have to show Hillary were the bathroom is. The Clinton’s may still have stuff stored in the basement which is another bonus.

Condi would bring a sense of newness to the race. Not only would she be the first Woman President but also the first African-American President. Hillary would bring a sense calming familiarity. Like a favorite shoe. An old shoe with a nail sticking up through the heel.

We can’t pick a winner to this heated possible future race. It will be interesting to see if Hillary and Condi remain ladies through the campaign. Or will they lunge at each other verbally like two female wrestler. Only time will tell....Biff....