Super scary Halloween story- WARNING- Contains Alan Grayson

Super scary Halloween story- WARNING- Contains Alan Grayson

Photobucket

Gather around kids, this story is spooky.

It seemed like a good day in Washington DC.

Better than a good day, it was a GREAT- good day, really.

The police had arrested the swine flu.



With swine flu, locked safely behind bars, it really was a GREAT- good day.

However, people should have worried; they should have been filled with fear.



For, today was Halloween and everyone in DC was running from the democrat’s Health Care Bill, to say the least.

This child from hell, (the health care bill) has destroyed many lives, including those who CREATED THIS SCARY BEAST.



2,000 pages of pure hell, which all of congress has read from front to back (Hah, hah.) This beast of a bill listed everything from vending machine food safety- to how high a new tax will be on Granny’s next oxygen machine.



It was a terrifying thing, telling people it would mean FREE health care, yet forcing people to BUY insurance, and all who gazed upon this monster, ran in fear.

Democrats who voted for this beast, now searching for reelection- claim: “I had little to do with it, I would have done it different, let me be clear.”

But, people in the community never seemed to notice. “..Why would they..??”

After all, it was a GREAT- good day, it just felt right.

A GREAT day, that is, until day turned to night.



All of the children were snuggled in their beds.

While visions of sugar plums danced in their heads.

When all of a sudden, from the lawn came such a clatter.

The children ran to the window to see what was the matter.

(Wow, this Halloween story sound familiar..??)

What they saw was so scary, the children started to run.

It was Florida’s democratic congressman: Rep. Alan Grayson.



With a DEEP, blood boiling voice, Grayson cried out in a roar:

“..I apologize to the DEAD. You K Street whore..”

The children ran to a closet, where they thought Grayson wouldn’t be.

But there was no hiding from The Grayson, he was on EVERY- TV..

“..Die quickly. K Street whore. I apologized to the dead..”

The words Grayson uttered was stuck in every child’s head.

The children huddled, as low as they could be.

One child look over, and shouted to me:

“..Kind sir, is there any way to kill this beast..?? Will he die..??”

“..Because Grayson is a democrat, “No.” Was my reply.



“..If the Grayson were a republican, there might be a way..”

“The mainstream media would swoop in to save the day.”



CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, THE TIMES, NEWSWEEK, and all...

Would grab their cameras, pitchforks, torches, and wait for the republican to fall.



The republican wouldn’t stand a chance.

(Anyone remember Mark Foley..??)



But, because this beast is a democrat, he will live on.

To devour your intellect, until free- thought is gone.



THE END

So, the moral of this story is:

If you are a politician, and you happen to be:

A crook





Or a crook who hides $90,000 bucks of bribe money in your freezer.



Or, you are the King of Pork and love spending tax payers money:



or you happen to be a sex pervert:





Crooked politicians, should heed my words, before joining the Fed.

Join the democrats, live forever, as the “Living Dead.”

HAPPY HALLOWEEN..!!

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

(Originally posted Oct 2009, with a few modern rewrites.)



I am very offended



You have offended me for the last time



I just read a story in which some people are offended that White actor: Robert Downey Jr was nominated for an award for playing a Black Man in the movie "Tropic Thunder."



Actually, Robert plays a White actor who is playing a Black man. So it isn’t Robert playing a Black man. (Although he is.) You following me on this..??



So, some people feel that a White guy playing a Black guy is a little Queer.



(I’m sorry. I didn’t mean "queer" as referring to a persons sexual preference.)

Let me try this again...

Some people are offended that a modern movie and a present day actor would actually have a White man paint his face dark and play a Black man.

Do these "offended" people have a point here? Or are they just being gay?



(OK, I screwed up again. I didn’t mean "gay" as in homosexual. I meant "gay" as in "weird.")

Oh.. Crap..??

I didn’t mean to say that "gay" was weird. I meant "gay" in the sense like they would have used the term "gay" back in the 1940's. Back when a White man could play a Black Man in a movie and no one would be offended.


OK, I didn’t mean that Black people in the 1940's were more "tolerant" than Black people today. No, I didn’t mean that at all.

What I was trying to say is that in the 1940's, you didn’t have people getting offended if a White man played a Black man or an Indian.



Hey, in the 40's, they called Native Americans: "Indians."

What the hell does that have to do with me..!!



What the #@$# could I have possibly said that would have offended a cow..??



Hey, all of you "offended" people are really starting to piss me off..!!

I can’t say anything without "offending" someone.


I have never been this "offended" in all my life..!!


Liberals being mugged by reality with Juan Williams

Liberals being mugged by reality with Juan Williams

Photobucket

I think that this whole situation with Juan Williams being fired by National Public Radio has caused some (not all, but some) liberals to be mugged by reality. It has opened their eyes and now they can see.

Photobucket

How can you possibly claim to be tolerant if you fire a guy for honestly speaking his mind and saying that he sometimes feels fear if he sees Muslims getting on a plane with him.

How can you possibly claim to watch out for minorities when you FIRE the only Black reporter at NPR just because he spoke his mind? Williams didn’t lie. He did not bend the truth. All he did was tell his innermost feelings about terrorism, and how the 9/11 attacks have made him feel.

How can you fire Williams and still claim to be open-minded?

You can not, and you are not being tolerant, or looking out for minorities. The AGENDA is the most important thing. More important than any silly little Black man and any fears that he might have over sitting on a plane with Muslims.

“Let’s talk about racism, let’s talk about terrorism, we need a dialogue”, the progressives are fond of saying. Yet, when Juan Williams tries to do just that, he is clubbed in the knees and taken down. Relegated to the likes of the evil Fox News, nevermore to be seen on traditional mainstream media.

What REALLY did Juan say..?? Juan didn’t say that he hates Muslims, or that he fears Muslims being near him, everywhere. He said that the image of outward looking Muslims on a plane with him, gives him fear.

You have got to take color and race out of the equation, (which is hard to do for democrats who are obsessed with race and skin color). Everyone has been walking down a city street, and had a group of scary looking people coming towards you. This group of people are loud, rowdy, and clearly up to no good. It doesn’t matter what color their skin is, they could be Mexican, or Black, or White looking Italians; it doesn’t freaking matter what race they are. The fact that these people are in a “gang”, and they are causing problems, puts fear in your heart until you have passed them by, safely.

This situation with Juan Williams is the same thing: because radicals, who believe in Islam, and dress like Muslims, keep attacking America and blowing shit up; this causes folks like Juan Williams (and myself) to fear people who dress like the terrorists, because they might blow shit up.

You shouldn’t be mad at Juan Williams, you should be mad at the radicals who dress like Muslims, blow shit up in the name of Allah and kill people, and are giving other Muslims a bad name. The radical members of Islam are who you should be mad at, not Williams for being honest.

For the liberal / progressive; let me put this another way: if you went to an Arab country, I am sure that you would find Muslims who fear the American soldier (because the American soldier is blowing shit up.) However, not all American soldiers ARE blowing shit up. Some US soldiers are there for the rebuilding of the country and the feeding of the people. Wouldn’t it be racist for Muslims to fear ALL of the American soldiers..?? (Aaah haaa, my liberal friend, you have just been mugged by reality.)

Photobucket

The sad truth is that Juan Williams has been fighting for liberal causes on Fox News for YEARS. Williams, by himself, has been surrounded by 3 or 4 conservatives at a time; trying to debate the relevance of some liberal program, all the while being outnumbered by conservatives on Fox.

Juan Williams has probably done MORE to promote liberal causes than NPR, Media Matters, and Move On- combined. Because Williams doesn’t “preach to the choir”, safely talking only to people who share his ideology, he goes directly into enemy territory: Fox News.

It should also be noted that Fox News, to my knowledge, has never shut down Juan Williams, for anything that he has said.

NPR’s response to this debacle, is: “Hey, well, it is too bad that this happened during our fund raising event. We need your money to keep quality programming on the air, so send in those donations. However, we cannot have some silly little man claim that he fears Muslims. We MUST think about journalistic integrity. Why, Muslims are the best bunch of people ever, far better than those evil Christians who caused the Spanish Inquisition (about a thousand years ago). So what if a few buildings got knocked down by Muslims and some people died, or the fact that the underwear bomber, or the shoe bomber, or the Times Square bomber, or the USS Cole bomber, or the US Embassy bombers, were all Muslims. That doesn’t mean a thing.”

Yep, that’s public radio. All dressed up in “politically correct” clothes, with no place to go.

Photobucket

I am going to let my fellow conservative colleagues talk about the other NPR reporters and the comments that they may have made in the past, who were NOT fired by NPR. I, personally, do not listen to NPR. I have tried, but listening to NPR reminds me of listening to someone trying to read the assembly instructions to an entertainment center purchased from IKEA. (“Take pin C and place it into hole B, using a slight turning motion. Then take bracket F and use screws marked L and attach bracket F to plank R as shown.”)

However, I do want to talk about the actions of a past- “respected journalist”, and the hypocrisy of the “tolerant” liberal.

If you asked someone today who is the most trusted man in the news business, they may give you a blank-stare, then reply: “I dunno, maybe Jerry Springer.”

But if you asked that question 30 years ago, the answer would be “Walter Cronkite.”

Photobucket

I do not want to condemn Walter Cronkite here; anyone who reaches the pinnacle of their game should be commended.

However, Cronkite was far from being a “non-bias journalist.” In fact, Cronkite was very, very bias.

Cronkite didn’t just report the news, Cronkite helped shape the news; and we are finding more on that today.

It has been said that without President JFK and Walter Cronkite, we never would have made it to the moon. JFK’s contribution goes without saying; however, Cronkite was there reporting for CBS all of the events that went into the building of the American space program. JFK set the moon mission up and Cronkite got Americans interested in it.

I do not think that we can condemn Cronkite for showing a bias in favor of the space program. Hey, we were all into it.

It is when we dive into the reporting on the Vietnam War that the lines between “reporting” and “shaping” the news become cloudy. Documents have surfaced which allegedly show how Cronkite not only reported on anti-war protests, Cronkite showed the protesters HOW to preform their rallies, what to say, which democrat politicians to get in touch with, and what time CBS News would be there, so the anti-war protesters could put their “best face on” for the cameras.

This is a photo-grab of one such document, allegedly showing Cronkite directing a war protest rally, (the protesters name has been removed.)

Photobucket

This is when many hippies realized that they too, could shape the news. This is when many hippies went into journalism to “change the world.” I speak about this connection between 1960's hippies and the “revolution by way of the pen” in my editorial on “The freedom hippies”, which you can find on “Angry Republic Radio”, at this LINK. (Since you are veiwing this editorial on The Angry Republic's News site, just look to the right for the radio player.)

Cronkite directing an anti-war protest rally? Folks, this is not reporting the news.

The funny thing is, this is exactly what liberals claim that Fox News does today: stage Tea Party rallies and then report on them. BUT, this has all been done before, about 40 years ago; by liberals, CBS News, the democrats, and Walter Cronkite.

Photobucket

So, for NPR to fire Juan Williams because: “NPR needs to uphold journalistic standards” is laughable. THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A NON-BIAS REPORTER, EVER.

(Did I just say that..??)

I have never found a non-bias reporter. As Benjamin Franklin once said: “There is freedom of the press, as long as you own the printing press.”

Let’s face it, even what you DO NOT report, shows a bias. All news stories are important to- someone. Yet, when you are putting together your newspaper, or your TV show, you MUST choose which stories to cover, because you do not have room for all of them. You must “guess” what stories that you think people will be interested in. In dong so, you are showing a bias.

Bias has been there, always. We could go back to the Roman Empire; to the days when “scribes” wrote out each book by hand, because there was no printing press. These scribes didn’t always copy each book, word for word; and were known to do a little “re-writing” of history themselves. Since many of the books about the Roman Empire were written a hundreds years after the empire fell, written by people from nations whom the Roman Empire had conquered earlier, these books do not always show the Roman Empire in a good light. Even today, we are still trying to figure out what was real, and what was fiction, from the Roman Empire.

So I get a little pissed off when I hear liberals talking about protecting their journalistic integrity. There never has been any, and we would be better off if people would just admit this. TELL ME WHO YOU ARE AND WHAT YOU STAND FOR, don’t lie to me and claim that you have no bias; when clearly you do.

Just be honest, that is all we ask.

Which is what Juan Williams was doing.

And he was fired by the “tolerant” people at public radio.

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

Photobucket

Photobucket

I HATE republicans because they HATE people

Photobucket

I HATE republicans because they HATE people

Oxymoron- (definition) A big guy named “Guido”, who has no neck, BIG stumpy arms, and is f**king stupid.

OR...

Anyone who say: “I hate people who hate people.”

Photobucket

Heading into the 2010 election, we find a choir of democrats claiming that republicans are filled with hate, and this would be a reason not to vote for republicans (because we hate.) Democrats claim that republicans hate Black people, Muslims, poor people, Mexicans, etc; the list goes on.

Photobucket

Even I, your humble writer, was told that “I hate” Gay people because I believe that “hate crimes laws” favor one group over other groups, and therefore is unconstitutional.

Actually, I do not hate anyone. Really! I like talking to liberals and progressives because I want to know why they believe the things that they believe.

However, perception is king.

I am, what I am. (Until someone calls me a nasty name, and that name happens to “stick.”)

So, I wanted to talk about “HATE”, and to do this; I will be using elements of Feng Shui in this post, so that we can reach our spiritual “center.” (Michelle Obama reminded all of us about the evil spirits that could surround us. I do not want evil spirits surrounding this web site, so here we go...)

Photobucket

Republicans are filled with hate.

The opposite of hate- would be love.

If you do not like the “hate” that republicans have, then you MUST be filled with love.

Photobucket

If you do not agree with someone because you claim that “they” are filled with hate, you must be saying that you are “different”; therefore you must believe that you are filled with love? Correct?

So, if you are filled with “love”, how can you say anything bad about anyone?

A person who is filled with true love doesn’t just love the people who agree with them. They love all people. You would love the pretty little blue bird who sings in the trees, just as much as you love the pit bull who chews on your leg.

True love means loving all.

And if you do not “love all”, then you too, are filled with hate.

I can say this, because years ago, I found my earthly center, I am at peace, I am filled with love for all, and I believe that you are a f**king “name calling” hypocrite.

Photobucket

How can a group of people; who hate the oil companies and the car companies because they “pollute the earth and rip off people”, say that you shouldn’t vote for republicans because republicans hate..??

You, yourself, are hateful of the rich. (Or, at least, you have a bigoted perspective towards the rich.)

How can a group of people; who hate Wal-mart because they “treat their workers badly and buy foreign made product” say anything negative about republicans who may, or may not hate..??

Photobucket

I do not have this problem.

I took Michelle Obama’s advice, and began praying to remove all of the bad spirits away from me, and this web site. There are no evil spirits here.

I no longer hate anyone. I am true love. You people suck, and you might as well bend over and drop your pants because the democrats are coming for you.

That reminds me, what is MSNBC’s new motto? “Leaning forward (and taking it.)” People, do they NOT have anyone at MSNBC hip enough to explain what that new phrase means..??

This is all starting to piss me off, I almost hate this.

However, I cannot “truly” hate because I have filled my heart with love. I have found my spiritual center, and I took a multi-vitamin.

I am above hate.

Hate is below me. (And hate can blow me. There, I said it. What are YOU going to do about it..??)

Photobucket

When you have mastered Fung Shui, like I have; when you have centered your inner spirit by using origami...

You CANNOT hate anyone. (Except, maybe, those stupid basterds who claim that you hate. You could hate them.)

Photobucket

I do not hate Mexicans because I want the US border sealed. I’m not after the poor Mexican farmer who is just trying to survive. I want to stop criminals and terrorists from slipping into the country. If you took a minute to listen to us, we have talked about a better migrant worker program, and maybe making it a little easier for a Mexican to do it “the right way” and become American citizens. That’s not HATE, that is common sense.

Ohhh, but it’s Sooooo easy to run to a microphone and claim that I hate Mexicans. By doing this, you no longer have to debate me, you just call me a nasty name; like a 5 year old.

Photobucket

I do not hate Muslims because I would like to see the Park 51 project moved further away from ground zero. I would like it moved out of respect for the 68% of Americans who do not want a Mosque built near ground zero. That is not hate, that is common sense. If you build the Mosque there, it will cause tension between people. That is a fact.

Instead of debating me on this, you quickly call me a name. However, name-calling doesn’t solve the problem.

Name calling is not good. And “good” is what we must strive to achieve. If you were filled with LOVE, like I am; you could never call me a nasty name, you stupid asshole.

Take Michelle Obama’s advice. Pray to remove all of the evil spirits from yourself.

Learn to love, truly love all. Including the oil companies, Wal-mart, and conservatives.

OK, maybe you do not have to “love” the oil companies. That might be a little too much.

However, before you condemn me because you claim that I hate people; take a good look at yourself, because what you are showing me could not be considered “love.”

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

Photobucket

Meanwhile, while you were reading my editorial, news continues to happen...

Back at the web site: Wikileaks, the owner and one of his TOP reporters are discussing a future story...

A story on leaked military documents about the War on Terror. (400,000 documents in all.)

Let’s look into the newsroom at Wikileaks

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

The Editorials

WHAT IF- Republicans were in charge?

Photobucket

The "what if" game is played by the insane, (and very bored people with nothing better to do.)


I’m not sure which category I fall into, but I was playing the "what if" game while reading several housing foreclosure stories.

These are terribly sad stories of people losing their homes during this present crisis. You cannot help but put yourself into their shoes. "What if" this happened to me.

These sad stories are out there, but most of these stories are falling under the radar of national attention, while democrats control the government.

"What if" republicans controlled the congress, the senate, and the white house? Would these stories of people being kicked out of their homes be mostly overlooked by the mainstream media?

To answer that, one only has to look into the year 1987, President Reagan, and the "homeless" crisis. Every MM media outlet had, at least one "homeless person" story, almost every day during that year.

So I feel very confidant in saying that the mainstream media would be pushing these foreclosure stories MUCH harder if republicans controlled things.

So, I thought to myself: "What if" the mainstream media treated democrats and republicans equal? "What if" they went after Obama and the foreclosure crisis, the way that they went after Reagan and the homeless?

"What if..??"

(Hhhmm, I wonder what that would look like..??)

Family of 9 children- home- FORECLOSED. Kicked out into the streets while President Obama drinks beer.



ARPRESS REPORTING- It was a cold, sticky, dreary, lonely, bedbug infested night. Sadness fell across this ONCE great country of ours, when news broke out that a family of NINE CHILDREN had to leave their family home; all of their dreams, and their entire future; taken from them by RICH mortgage brokers.

The Earl Family were now forced to live by the charity of others. The Earl’s; once proud and independent American people, now forced to live in the bedbug infested streets. All the while, President Obama was drinking beer with his buddies, somehow detached from the rest of us, and our suffering.

Photobucket


Since this awful time, President Obama has sought to stop all foreclosures pending proper investigation, however; is it far, far to late?

Is it far, far, far, far, to late, late, late, late, Mr. Obama..??

OK, I cannot go on with this joke. You get the point. If this were a republican president, the foreclosure news would receive TOP billing in the mainstream media.


I cannot believe...


We were talking about media bias in the 1980's, and here it is; 30 years later, and we are still talking about the media bias towards liberalism.


However, it will change. As more and more conservatives get into journalism, (like liberals did 20 years ago) we will see a more balanced news system.


It will take some time.


After all, many of your top news outlets are run by people who grew out of the 70's hippie movement. They got into journalism to: "change the world", not necessarily to report the news.


(We have to wait for these old hippies to retire, or get fired.)


It will be some "hot-shot", young buck who has a spark of genius, and says:


"Hey, I got an idea. Instead of trying to lead people into liberalism, let’s report the news. After we report the who, what where, when, and how; let’s have a TOP liberal and a TOP conservative debate the issue, and we can present both sides."


Gee, I wonder if anyone has thought of that yet?


Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic


LINK- Sad, sad foreclosure story


After buying a house for $500,000, and borrowing $300,000 in cash from equity on the home (now owing $800,000); the Earl (family with 9 children) couldn’t pay their mortgage and was evicted.


However, they broke into their old home and are "squatting" there, with the help of their attorney.


(One problem) Someone already bought the home and spent $40,000 to fix it up.


Do you feel sorry for them? Or not?

Photobucket

Is the president insane? (Or does he think that you are stupid?)

Photobucket

If you were the president and you were set to speak at an event sponsored by the US Chamber of Commerce, would you head out and trash the US Chamber of Commerce beforehand, and claim that they are funneling foreign money to republicans, which (would be) corrupting our government system?


Hell no..!!

If you were sane, complete with all your wits, you would do one of three things first: (one) cancel the speaking event because it wouldn’t be right to speak at an event sponsored by such an evil organization (such as the Chamber of Commerce.)


(Two) Demand that a special congressional investigation begin looking into foreign money going to the RNC by way of the Chamber of Commerce.


(Three) Look ahead in your speaking engagement calendar so you do not screw up again and condemn an organization that you are scheduled to celebrate in the future.


Democrats and the president have done none of these things.



Photobucket

First off, as I write this, President Obama is still scheduled to speak at the US-India Business Council (Nov 6th- 9th), which is co-sponsored by India’s Business Council and the US Chamber of Commerce. So Obama will still be speaking for those EVIL people in the CC.


Second, if you had proof that republicans were getting tons of foreign cash, why would you go to the media first, AND NOT PRESS CHARGES in a US court? This doesn’t make sense? Any sane person would file the charges first, then go to the media and say: “We believe republicans are ‘blah, blah, blah’, and we have filed formal charges ‘blah, blah, blah.” Democrats didn’t do this. They rushed to the media hoping that you were stupid enough to believe without evidence.


(And three) This is not the first time that this type of thing has happened to the Obama administration. I have said this before and will repeat it often: President Obama has surrounded himself with buddies and cronies, none of which seem to have much experience running anything (IE- a business, a state, a country). So, they keep making mistakes like this.


Is President Obama insane?



Photobucket

No, not at all. Anyone who can win the presidency MUST have their wits.


But because Obama has surrounded himself with cronies, who lack experience, Obama comes off sometimes as acting: “stupidly.”


Ego forces the Obama administration to plow forward, after a mistake like this, hoping you are too stupid to check the facts.


Never underestimate the American people.


Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic


Special thanks to Newsbusters and Hot Air.


The Newsbusters story

The Hot Air story






Photobucket