Save the earth, Save the poor- Strange bedfellows

Save the earth, Save the poor- Strange bedfellows

I have lost track of whom is sleeping with who?

Is Brad Pitt now sleeping with Jennifer Aniston? Who is Angelina Jolie sleeping with?

Photobucket

I have no idea?

But there has been two groups of people sleeping together within the democrat party that makes for strange bed partners.

No, we are NOT talking about the Edwards’ and the Clinton’s.

It is the “Save the earth” people, and the “Save the poor” group.

These two groups really have nothing in common.

They should not date.

Photobucket

I have always wondered how the environmentalists could belong to the same political party as BIG labor Unions?

Let’s face it, if environmentalists had their way, they would shut down many of the smokey factories that Labor Unions thrive at.

And if Labor Unions had their way, they would build a hundred NEW “smokey factories”, filled with a million NEW workers; all paying dues into the Labor Union.

If each group had it’s way, it would put a hurting on the other group; in an attempt to “Save” something.

From the 1900's, democrats (progressives) seemed to focus on “Saving” the poor people.

However, in the 1970's, democrats added “save the earth” as a new goal of it’s party.

Why the NEW goal..??

Well, when you have help create and pushed government programs like Welfare, Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare; (all designed the solve the problem of “poor people”, but they haven’t solved the problem because we still have poor people) soon, you are going to run out of people to claim that you have helped..!! Correct..??

Or, to be more precise, Americans begin to question why your past government programs are not working. If Medicaid and Medicare are such good programs, why are we, TODAY, concerned about 30 million Americans without health insurance? Wasn’t that the goal of Medicaid? To cover people who were poor, or out of work?

Now, you want us to trust you democrats in creating a whole new government program..??

Photobucket

Instead of dealing with questions like these, wouldn’t it be better to have a whole new crisis to manage..??

Why not save the earth?

The earth is in trouble.

The earth is heating up, which is causing a cooling effect with lots more snow, which is making things much warmer.

Only YOU can stop the earth from warming up. (SIC) By driving your car less often, and using a “Snuggie” blanket, you can save the earth.

Photobucket

As long as you have a new crisis “to solve”, less intelligent people are distracted from looking at your past record (screw ups.)

Lets go back and talk about Medicaid for a moment, because you cannot make this point enough.

We trusted the democrats (President Johnson) to solve the problem of poor people NOT having health insurance. The solution that was given to us was Medicaid. Medicaid was America’s first step into “socialized medicine”, started way back in 1965.

But it didn’t work, did it?

Because if it had worked, we wouldn’t be talking about 30 million Americans without health insurance, today.

Why would we trust the democrats with a new program..?? Why not fix the old program?

In the business world, a boss would demand: “Why would I pay you to fix your own F**K up? You were supposed to fix it right the first time.”

Aaahh, but the best solution would be to move on to a brand new crisis that MUST be dealt with now, or we all will die.

Global cooling, global warming, climate change.

A merger was formed within the democrat party. The progressives have a really cool gig going on here. “Let’s save the poor people and lets save the earth at the SAME time”

What could be better..!!

We all love people, and we want to help the poor. And we all love the earth. Why not save them both..??

Let’s save the earth, too..!!

A more intelligent person would ask: “Hold on a minute, didn’t we create the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), the DEP (Department of Environmental Protection), and the DER (Department of Environmental Resources) in the 1970's to help clean up the earth and to stop people from polluting? Why are we creating whole new government programs? Why not fix the ones that we already have?”

But the message from Washington is: “There is no time, people are dying, the earth is heating up and we are driving off a cliff, we MUST act now..”

Whenever I hear a salesperson tell me to “hurry up, do not delay, you MUST act now”; I become very leery. “Do not think about it, just act NOW” is what the salesperson is asking. (Make no mistake, a politician IS a salesperson. They spend one year “selling” themselves to you. And once they win the election, they spend the next few years “selling” an idea to you.

So, what I wanted to do today, was look inside this marriage between the “save the earth”, and the “save the poor” groups.

Photobucket

To “save the poor”, you must get food to the poor. To feed people, we must change to flow of water in rivers to irrigate farmland, we must rip down trees to build new farmlands. We must use...

Photobucket

HOLD ON, (says “save the earth”) you are NOT ripping down any trees. And if you THINK that you are going to change the flow of a river, you got another thing coming. This earth is fragile, and I will not allow you to screw it all up.

(“Save the earth” offers their ideas on feeding the poor) We must have GREEN farms that use no chemical fertilizers. These farms grow organic produce with no pesticides and no preservatives. We could pick the produce by hand so no machines are...

Whoooa, (says “save the poor”) if you are going to use organic food, then you better transport it by super-sonic jet because organic food doesn’t have a long shelf -life. And with no pesticides, you will need to grow three times as much food because you will lose half of your crop to disease and insects.

Look, food is just part of the problem, (says “save the poor”) we need to get the poor people- JOBS. We need to advance technologies in third- world counties, which will create factories and jobs for the poor. If we have to power these factories with nuclear or clean coal, so be it. The important thing is to build bigger factories which will...

I have heard enough, (says “save the earth”) there is no “clean coal.” You will NOT build any more dirty factories. You are killing the earth.

Photobucket

There is a better way to put the poor to work, (offers “save the earth”) we will create “green jobs” for people to work at. People can build “green cars”. We can have people build and install windmills and solar panels. This will create millions of “green jobs” and save the earth at the same...

HA, HA, Ha (laughs “save the poor”). People already make cars. People are already employed in “making cars.” Just because you are making a different kind of car, doesn’t mean that you will make MORE cars. People buy cars when they need them. And GREEN jobs..?? What happen to all the “Cell Jobs”..?? When cell phone towers were popping up all over the country, sure; it was employment for people making and installing all of the cell phone towers (for a while.) But, eventually, when you have installed all of the cell phone towers that you need, these people are out of a job. The same is true with “green jobs” and the making and installing of windmills and solar panels. Once you have installed all of the windmills and solar panels, these “green jobs” will end.

Photobucket

Oh yea, (yells “save the earth”) well if you do not start taking better care of the earth, you will die from global climate change.

Is that so, (replies “save the poor”) if you do not feed the poor and get the poor people jobs, you will have a revolution on your hands, and you elitists will be dragged off in handcuffs.

(Sorry, I cannot print the rest of this fight between “save the earth” and “save the poor”. It becomes graphic, and very sad.)

What you are witnessing is a common “lovers fight.” The kind of thing that happens in every marriage.

Also common, is the tactic of trying to blame “outside forces” for their problems; such as money, friends, etc.

Photobucket

As with the marriage between “save the earth” and “save the poor”; they tried to blame an “outside force” called: The Republicans.

But the Republicans were merely bystanders to this unholy union. Republicans didn’t have enough votes in congress to stop any program that the democrats proposed.

Nope, this lovers spat was produced by two groups who share little in common with each other. Other than the fact that they both belong to the same political party.

If you were wondering why the Health Care Bill stalled? If you were wondering why Cap and Trade slowed down it’s momentum? Now you know the answer.

You cannot save the earth and save the poor at the same time.

If you do not agree with me, you are a racist, and you HATE women.

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

Photobucket

Photobucket

“One of the most disturbing things about the Republican Party over the last couple of decades is that they just don’t believe in science any more. And that is not an approach that is likely to generate any kind of creative thinking…People who use snowstorms as an example of why global warming doesn’t exist don’t understand the science and they don’t care.”

Spoken by Howard Dean

Oh, yea...

Well, Doctor Dean, you are a big doodie head.

Actually, Mr Dean; I believe in the science that landed man on the moon. I believe in the science that creates life saving medicine. I even believe in the science that will help save a fuzzy little bunny.

However, when science begins to hide numbers, when science starts to rig graphs to hide a global “cooling” pattern, when science will no longer listen to objective counter theories, we are no longer talking about “science” Mr Dean; we are talking about “faith.”

If I am going to place my “faith” in anyone, it will be in God.

Photobucket

The now famous “GREEN Police” car commercial.



AAA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq58zS4_jvM

Happy Valentines Day..!!

Photobucket

Sarah Palin- is she ready?

Today’s editorial is on Sarah Palin, but first...

Congratulations to the New Orleans Saints for winning their first Super Bowl.

Photobucket

That was a real exciting game to watch..!!

But I have to ask...

What happened to the “greatest quarterback to ever play the game..??”

Photobucket

Sorry about the sarcasm, but I had to listen, for weeks, as sportscasters talked about Peyton Manning being THE BEST quarterback, EVER.

Photobucket

Around Pittsburgh, we are kind of partial to Terry Bradshaw. Win 4 Super Bowls and THEN come back to me and talk about being “the best.” Sure, Bradshaw gave up a lot of interceptions, but mistakes only matter when you are losing. And Bradshaw took the Steelers to 8 AFC Championship games.

Photobucket

Or how about Joe Montana, who also helped his team (The 49ers) win 4 Super Bowls. I believe that Joe Montana is the best quarterback to ever play the game. Sure, people like Manning might have better “numbers”, but what good are numbers if you lose the BIG games..??

People who were calling Peyton Manning “the best quarterback ever” did not help the Colts.

It was the reason that I was looking for the Saints to win.

OK, on with today’s editorial in politics...

Photobucket

Sarah Palin- Is she ready?

“..Sarah Palin has the drive and determination. She has the crowd appeal. She can clearly raise enough money to run. And when Sarah wants to, she says all the right things.

I have no fear of what a ‘President Palin’ would do for this country.

My biggest concern is what the Left will do to Sarah Palin..”

Photobucket

“..Never strike a lady, physically or verbally..” used to be a virtue amongst men.

Today, that virtue has become as antiquated as young men waiting to board an elevator until all the women, children, and the elderly have step inside.

Just ask David Letterman, who has been verbally striking Sarah Palin for years. Or you could ask MSNBC who uses Sarah as a punching bag. Or the NY Times who uses a picture of Sarah on their dart board, Or... (Oh, hell. No need to list them all. You already know the “usual suspects.”)

Photobucket

It would seem that Fox News is the only organization willing to listen to Sarah.

Sure, the others would LOVE to interview Palin. However, they are searching for their own personal: “gottcha” moment. They will ask question of Sarah Palin that they would never ask of Barack Obama. And when Sarah slips up, (which she will) it will be broadcast forever.

Therein lies the problem with:

Presidential Candidate- Sarah Palin

The Left will attack Sarah Palin like rabid dogs, foaming at the mouth. If you think that the Liberal Left was unfair to Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin...

My friend, you haven’t seen anything yet..!!

The attacks from the left, on “Sarah Palin for President” will make you lose faith in humanity.

Photobucket

This is why I pay little attention to my friends on the Right who attack President Obama with a never ending endurance. Because I already know what people on the left will do to Sarah Palin.

And so the “game” of politics continues.

The mainstream media (CBS, NBC, ABC) will ask Barack Obama tough questions like: “How does it feel to be-you?” Or the MSM will ask Barack the ever- telling and probing question: “President Obama, when you wake up in the morning, do you realize how intelligent you are..??”

Photobucket

However, when interviewing Sarah Palin; the MSM asks softball questions like: “Gov. Palin, recite the Bush doctrine to me, line-by-line.”

I know that Sarah Palin is ready to talk to conservatives.

But is Sarah Palin ready for the rest of the country..??

That is the question.

BY THE NUMBERS

When trying to play a “political war game”, you have to ask: 2012- (Obama- against- ????); who BEST fits in this equation..??

President Obama is not a great leader. We should have known this by his life history. Barack gets board with every job and position that he is ever held. He has always been looking for something else. He prefers to let “other people” run the day-to-day operation of things.

However, Obama is a GREAT campaigner. We must not forget that.

If we want to toss someone out there to the wolves, for the sake of conservative principals; making a statement is vital and conservatives MUST make a statement.

However, if we want to win these elections; (2010, 2012) we must really think about who can BEST fight these wolves.

I want to run down the top republican “possible” candidates for 2012. I am going to hold Sarah Palin for last, even though she is in the top three (Romney, Palin, Huckabee). If you have any other names that you would like to add, please do so by commenting.

Photobucket

Mitt Romney- It should be of no surprise to people who have read my web site for some time that I support Romney. I believe that Romney has the business and economic experience to help America out of this recession. However, Romney has voted for liberal programs while he was governor. He can be attacked for this. It would be a tough choice for me between Romney and Palin (if nothing changes from the present.)

Photobucket

Mike Huckabee- What a heck of a nice guy. He is funny and very multi-talented. The kind of guy that you would probably enjoy talking to. However, Huckabee, (like John McCain) has a tendency to try and appeal to moderates and liberals. I could be wrong about Huckabee, but this would stop me from nominating him.

Newt Gingrich- He talks tough conservatism, yet sides with liberals on global warming. He says the right things and has great ideas; but then Newt supports a liberal- republican Representative in NY State (who loses.) Gingrich gets a NO vote for me.

Rudy Giuliani- forget about it..!!

Tim Pawlenty- I like this guy. I like the way he talks. But he needs to get himself out there in the press. As it stands right now, Pawlenty only draws about 2 or 5 % of the straw poll numbers. (Compared to Romney, Palin, and Huckabee drawing 20% each.)

John Thune- ????

Rick Santorum- Aahh, ok- NEXT

Mitch Daniels- “Governor, we can’t hear you. Speak louder and more often..!!”

Bobby Jindal- Man this guy had fire in his belly. Then he gave that Republican rebuttal from the Louisiana Governor’s mansion and it was like watching a children’s show. He could over-come that.

Photobucket

Michele Bachmann- I know that a few of my conservative friends would like to see a Palin / Bachmann ticket in 2012. I have no problem with that. (To steal a line from comedian Mike Myers- “Women taking over? “Grrrrrr, YEA baby..!!” OK, I had to stick at least ONE sexist line in there.) However, FOR PRESIDENT- I would vote for Palin or Romney over Bachmann for the republican nomination.

Photobucket

Ron Paul- (OK, I could fill an editorial about Ron Paul.) Was America ready for a libertarian in 2008? (I guess not.) Will America be ready for Ron Paul in 2012? Presenting conservatism will be a challenge to explain in 2012, to a generation who has grown up with FREE government gifts and programs. Ron Paul would have to start today, RIGHT NOW, campaigning across America. Stopping at every little town and city. Thousands of speeches by Paul, to sell the kind of cuts that a TRUE libertarian proposes.

Photobucket

Sarah Palin- As I said early on, I would have a hard time choosing between Sarah and Romney. If I had my choice, I would have both on the same ticket, as running mates. Though, I’m not sure that either would settle for the VP position.

I tried to listen to Sarah Palin’s speech at the Tea Party, and...

(Man, this is really hard to say..)

It’s not working for me.

I have to agree with Glenn Beck who stated that Sarah is too guarded while being interviewed. Bill O’Reilly kind of agreed that Sarah Palin “might” not be ready to run for president, yet.

What does Sarah need, to be ready..?? (If she chooses to run, that is.)

Sarah needs a vocal coach. Unfortunately, women have to work harder than men do in projecting their voice over large crowds. This can cause women to sound like they are screeching. A vocal coach should be able to help.

Photobucket

Also, Sarah needs someone on her team who understands audio sound systems. The LAST thing a candidate needs is to allow a local event planner to pick a sound system. Many times, these events are strapped for cash and will rent cheaper sound systems. With the size of crowds that Sarah draws, she cannot afford to show up at an event that has a cheap sound system. An audio professional would be able to work with the event planner months ahead of time to estimate crowd size and which speakers to use, and the wattage of amplification. (Hell, Team Obama had audio technicians providing him with “echo effects” in his sound systems that made Obama sound “God- Like.”) We republicans have got to get hip.

Sarah needs some good speech writers. (They all use speech writers.)

Photobucket

Might I humbly suggest a writing team in which one member heads to the next event, town, or state where Palin will speak. This writer learns the dreams, the history, and the wants of this region. Then this writer travels back to Sarah Palin and joins the second writer who specializes in conservative ideology and American history. Sarah and her writing team will write a tailor made speech for every event she will attend.

Photobucket

Sarah needs a hell of a great manager. Someone who records everything Sarah says and checks all future speeches so that Sarah never contradicts herself.

Most of all, Sarah must be herself. She MUST edited every speech that her writers prepare. Removing things that she doesn’t believe in. She must be honest.

Photobucket

Sarah Palin could win the republican nomination if she wants to. She could win my vote if she tries.

It is a shame that women have to work harder than men to achieve this goal. But they do.

So, like one of those “Home and Garden” network TV shows, where they are always fixing up something, I say...

“Run, Sarah, Run...” But lets get you a kick-ass sound system. Lets work on vocal projection. And throwing stones at President Obama is cool. But lets write a speech in which it takes Obama a few seconds to realize that he has just been punked.

If you do not agree with me, you are a racist. And you hate women.

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

Photobucket

SIDE NOTES

Is it “retarded”..??

The Left does NOT “get” Rush Limbaugh, do they..!!

I have to laugh. The Left gives Rush Limbaugh so much FREE publicity. But they just do not understand him.

And now they are dragging Sarah Palin into this.

OK, I have never heard Rush use the word “retard” on a regular basis. I don’t think I have ever heard him use the word.

However, when Obama’s Chief- of- Staff Rahm Emanuel called democrats: “F**king retards,” and THEN- Rahm apologized for using that word, BUT didn’t apologize for insulting democrats...

Come on, that is funny stuff..!!

Photobucket

(OK, let me slow down for the liberals and try and explain it, so you will understand.)

See, Rahm never apologized for insulting democrats, he only apologized for using that word. Since democrats excepted Rahm’s apology, one MUST assume that it is OK for Team Obama to insult his own voters.

Do you follow this now..??

OK, once Rahm opened that door up, Rush walked on through.

Since democrats do not mind being called “f**king retards”, (liberals only concern is the use of the word, itself) Rush decided to refer to democrats as “retards” for the remainder of that show.

One person said the word out of anger to degrade humans.

The other person used the word for comedy.

There is a clear difference here.

A high official in the Obama Administration should NEVER use that word.

However, a guy doing comedy on the radio..?? Come on..!!

If Alex Baldwin was in a comedy bit and he used the word “retard”, no one would care. If “Larry the Cable Guy” talked about his retarded friends, who would pay attention.

Rush, making fun of what Obama’s Chief of Staff said, is not news.

However, Rahm should be a bit more professional. After all, he is a government official.

Photobucket

Sarah Palin is correct in her concern. A government official should never use a word like that. A guy doing comedy is something different.

Besides, doesn’t Palin’s opinion matter the most..?? Considering that she is the only one in this whole situation who actually has a child with mental disabilities.

Or does the Left not care about that anymore?

No, the left cares more that Sarah Palin had a few notes written on her hand during the Tea Party speech.

Photobucket

That’s funny stuff..!! Most people that I have met from the Left are in trouble if they do not have access to Google Search during a debate. Yet, they criticize a person for writing a few key notes on their hand..??

Yea, the beat goes on. Thank you for checking out my site..!!

Photobucket

Do not ask, do not tell: Homo- erectus

Photobucket

Do not ask, do not tell: Homo- erectus

I like to push buttons.

I love to get people going.

Photobucket

One of my favorite things to do is to turn an argument around, and toss it back at my opponent.

Photobucket

I try and do this with government health insurance. If you are going to give people FREE health insurance, shouldn’t you also give them FREE food? What will kill a person quicker; lack of food, or lack of insurance..??

Last year, I used this trick with our government’s military policy of “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Part of the “hopey change” that President Obama promised while campaigning was that he would end the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

OK, I was using this unkept promise to rag on liberals; Why hasn’t Obama ended this policy? The president could sign a paper tomorrow and put an end to “don’t ask, don’t tell”, but he hasn’t?

Well, what do you know, President Obama has brought it up again, recently. A promise to END “don’t ask, don’t tell.” I still believe, (and I would almost bet money on this) that Obama will NOT do anything with this military policy. I think that he is just throwing a bone to the Gay community, I do not see him acting on this because he needs all the support that he can get.

John McCain has gotten himself into trouble with his liberal friends for demanding NOT to change the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

Photobucket

At the risk of sounding like I am defending John McCain, or defending a policy produced by President Clinton, I did want to give my point of view.

As far as what I believe in- with Gay Rights...

I have changed my thinking on this topic in the past few years. I do not want the government telling me what I can eat, what car I can drive, or what the temperature of my house should be. So what right do I have forcing the government to dictate who can legally marry?

However, do not force churches to marry Gay people. If a church is reluctant to marry Gay people, they should have that right. To force otherwise, would be unconstitutional.

Yet, with that said, I do not understand the anger that Gay people have over the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy..??

Photobucket

Before President Clinton signed this law, the military would ask people if they were Gay. If you answered YES, you were told to leave. So this forced Gay people to lie, if they wanted to serve our country.

Photobucket

After Bill Clinton passed this law, the military cannot ask if you are Gay, however, you cannot prance around the military base and flaunt that you are Gay.

OK, here is what I do not understand...

Why do people feel the need to announce their sexuality..??

Do women who serve in the military wear high- heels, camouflage mini- skirts with G-stings, and a peek-a-boo tank top while fighting on the battle field..??

That might actually help confuse the enemy, however women do not flaunt their sexuality on the battle field. “They are soldiers. Fighting for America.”

Photobucket

Back at the military base, do women soldiers wear skimpy shorts with a t-shirts that read: “I prefer penis”..??

What is it that the Gay person is fighting for..??

Are you fighting for the right to proclaim to everyone who you prefer to have sex with..??

What does that have to do with the military..?? How will that help to protect the country..??

What do you want the military to do..??

Photobucket

(OK, follow me here, because this is going to get tricky.)

If the military knows that you are a Gay male, and they place you in a barracks with heterosexual men, wouldn’t that be like placing a heterosexual women in a room full of men..??

Do we need to build 4 different barracks. One for heterosexual males, one for heterosexual women, one for lesbians, and one for Gay males..??

(But that will not work..??)

Wouldn’t putting lesbians together in one room be the same as pairing straight men and women together..??

And what do we do with the bi-sexual people..?? THEY COULD GO BOTH WAYS..!!

Do we need to build little rooms for each of the Gay people to sleep in, alone..??

What is it that the Gay Community is fighting for..??

I have tried to put it into prospective, but I cannot.

For example, at work; during a business meeting where we are talking about problems and solutions, costs and profit. I have NEVER felt the urge to stand up in front of the meeting and say: “This is a great meeting people, but I wanted to tell you all that I dig chicks. I love women. I am kind of a breast man, but I do love legs. The shorter the dress, the better! Because I love me some women..”

Photobucket

I have never felt the need to do that, so I do not understand what Gay people are fighting for?

Is it that you have felt shame because of your sexuality when you were young, so you reach a point in your life that you do not care anymore, and you want to shout out to everyone that you are Gay..??

OK, I can understand that, but what does that have to do with defending the country..??

Photobucket

How will telling people that you are Gay help provide a better military for our country..??

Women in the military are asked to dress- down their sexuality while serving. Men are asked to take showers, wear pants, and not be drunk all day long. And Gay people are asked to not go up to every freaking person they meet and proclaim: “HI, I’m Gay.”

Everyone who joins the military is giving up their home life to serve their country. Everyone gives up something.

I guess I do not understand the need of Gay people to publically proclaim their Gayness..??

If you do not agree with me, you are a racist, and you hate women..!!

Photobucket

Photobucket

Here is one of the attacks on John McCain for wanting to keep “Don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Comment made by someone called: “Death panels”

“..I'm against haters serving in the Military. McCain should have his record expunged and medals revoked!

EVERYBODY is expected to uphold and defend the constitution without exception. Every single person is expected to defend America, without exception.

It is wrong, very very wrong, to deny any person their duty and right to defend America as best they can. McCain was permitted to serve -- who the hell is this anti-Constitutionalist to deny others for religious discrimination reason based on HATE THEOLOGY!

Prosecute hate crimes which deny citizens their full rights. Prosecute McCain!..”

Photobucket

Thanks for reading

The Angry Republic

Photobucket